17-1270814-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM1PP3_Strong
The NM_001164405.2(BHLHA9):c.251C>T(p.Ala84Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000129 in 1,475,800 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A84D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164405.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- mesoaxial synostotic syndactyly with phalangeal reductionInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- tibial aplasia-ectrodactyly syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- Camptosynpolydactyly, complexInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- split-hand/foot malformation with long bone deficiency 1Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001164405.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 151778Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000738 AC: 6AN: 81270 AF XY: 0.0000862 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000128 AC: 169AN: 1324022Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000138 AC XY: 90AN XY: 652910 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 151778Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000810 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74118 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at