17-17215284-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_144997.7(FLCN):c.1333G>A(p.Ala445Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00293 in 1,614,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

FLCN
NM_144997.7 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:2B:23O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0320

Variant links:

Genes affected

FLCN (HGNC:27310): (folliculin) This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Mutations in this gene are associated with Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome, which is characterized by fibrofolliculomas, renal tumors, lung cysts, and pneumothorax. Alternative splicing of this gene results in two transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

FLCN links:

ENSG00000264187 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000264187 links:

MPRIP (HGNC:30321): (myosin phosphatase Rho interacting protein) Enables cadherin binding activity. Predicted to be involved in actin filament organization. Located in actin cytoskeleton and cytosol. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

MPRIP links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004835129).

BP6

Variant 17-17215284-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-17215284-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 3370.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=13, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=2, not_provided=1}. Variant chr17-17215284-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-17215284-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00244 (372/152276) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00588 (90/15298). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0049. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 174 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 372 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FLCN	NM_144997.7 link	c.1333G>A	p.Ala445Thr	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 14	ENST00000285071.9	NP_659434.2	Q8NFG4-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FLCN	ENST00000285071.9 link	c.1333G>A	p.Ala445Thr	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 14	1	NM_144997.7	ENSP00000285071.4	Q8NFG4-1
ENSG00000264187	ENST00000427497.3 link	n.*167G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 8 of 12	1		ENSP00000394249.3	J3QW42
ENSG00000264187	ENST00000427497.3 link	n.*167G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 8 of 12	1		ENSP00000394249.3	J3QW42
MPRIP	ENST00000578209.5 link	c.*18-2206C>T		intron_variant	Intron 5 of 5	3		ENSP00000464276.1	J3QRL2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00244

AC:

372

AN:

152158

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00589

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00346

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00228

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000471

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0190

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00334

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00431

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00264

AC:

662

AN:

251048

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00280

AC XY:

380

AN XY:

135710

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000247

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00202

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00268

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00337

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000648

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00370

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00391

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00298

AC:

4358

AN:

1461806

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00307

AC XY:

2235

AN XY:

727190

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000538

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00212

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00237

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00398

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000712

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00318

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00318

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00244

AC:

372

AN:

152276

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00234

AC XY:

174

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00588

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00346

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000194

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00228

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000471

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00334

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00426

Alfa

AF:

0.00308

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00244

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00324

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00311

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000681

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00256

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00270

AC:

328

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00387

EpiControl

AF:

0.00397

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2Benign:23Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:9

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 21, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22703879, 20522427, 21937013, 24728327, 19116017, 12843323, 29357828) -

Aug 30, 2021

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: flagged submission

Collection Method: research

- -

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

FLCN: BP4, BS2 -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:6

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 18, 2016

Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2019

Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 21, 2018

Equipe Genetique des Anomalies du Developpement, Université de Bourgogne

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 06, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -

not specified

Benign:5Other:1

Nov 10, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 13, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 06, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Ala445Thr in exon 12 of FLCN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 0.37% (246/66324) of European chrom osomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org ; dbSNP rs41419545). Additionally, 47 species including 27 mammals have a threon ine (Thr) at this position. -

Dec 03, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: FLCN c.1333G>A (p.Ala445Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0026 in 251048 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency greatly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in FLCN causing Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome phenotype (1.3e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1333G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome (Kahnoski_2003), without strong evidence of causality. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. 12 clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments, 10 classify as likely benign/benign while 2 classify as VUS. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Oct 30, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Aug 04, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Carcinoma of colon

Pathogenic:1

Jul 01, 2003

OMIM

Significance: Pathogenic

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Familial spontaneous pneumothorax

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.064

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.48

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

0.11

DANN

Benign

0.75

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.31

Eigen

Benign

-1.8

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.8

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.010

LIST_S2

Benign

0.60

M_CAP

Benign

0.060

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0048

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.57

MutationAssessor

Benign

-1.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.29

PROVEAN

Benign

0.19

REVEL

Benign

0.20

Sift

Benign

0.87

Sift4G

Benign

0.55

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.20

MVP

0.19

MPC

0.36

ClinPred

0.0014

GERP RS

-7.5

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.024

gMVP

0.20

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over