17-18142796-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.5866C>T(p.Arg1956Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000578 in 1,613,652 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00028 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00061 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
MYO15A
NM_016239.4 missense
NM_016239.4 missense
Scores
1
13
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.96
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO15A | NM_016239.4 | c.5866C>T | p.Arg1956Trp | missense_variant | 25/66 | ENST00000647165.2 | NP_057323.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO15A | ENST00000647165.2 | c.5866C>T | p.Arg1956Trp | missense_variant | 25/66 | NM_016239.4 | ENSP00000495481 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000283 AC: 43AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
43
AN:
152170
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000283 AC: 70AN: 247210Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000208 AC XY: 28AN XY: 134412
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
70
AN:
247210
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
28
AN XY:
134412
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000609 AC: 890AN: 1461364Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000581 AC XY: 422AN XY: 726954
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
890
AN:
1461364
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
422
AN XY:
726954
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000282 AC: 43AN: 152288Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74464
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
43
AN:
152288
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
74464
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
AC:
24
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:11Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Uncertain:5
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jan 04, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Aug 04, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Sep 22, 2020 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Al Jalila Children’s Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality Hospital | Feb 07, 2021 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 20, 2023 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 33879512, 35133174, 26969326) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 25, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 05, 2014 | The Arg1956Trp variant in MYO15A has been previously reported by our laboratory in the heterozygous state in one individual with hearing loss, but a variant aff ecting the remaining copy of MYO15A was not identified. This variant has been i dentified in 0.096% (8/8340) of European American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project and in 0.82% (1/122) of African American chromosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs185873402). Alt hough this variant has been seen in the general population, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses suggest that the Arg1956Trp variant may impact the protein , though this information is not predictive enough to determine pathogenicity. In summary, the clinical significance of the Arg1956Trp variant is uncertain. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 07, 2023 | Variant summary: MYO15A c.5866C>T (p.Arg1956Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00028 in 247210 control chromosomes (gnomAD). c.5866C>T has been reported in the literature in at least one compound heterozygous individual affected with Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Hearing (Sloan-Heggen_2016). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33879512, 26969326). Seven ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014, and all submitters classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;D;D
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;.;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
.;D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
.;D;.
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;D
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at