17-18151859-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.7801A>T(p.Lys2601*) variant causes a stop gained change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016239.4 stop_gained
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016239.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO15A | NM_016239.4 | MANE Select | c.7801A>T | p.Lys2601* | stop_gained | Exon 41 of 66 | NP_057323.3 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO15A | ENST00000647165.2 | MANE Select | c.7801A>T | p.Lys2601* | stop_gained | Exon 41 of 66 | ENSP00000495481.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1424846Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 704792
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Pathogenic:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at