17-2057487-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_006497.4(HIC1):c.797C>G(p.Ala266Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000921 in 1,483,958 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A266T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006497.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006497.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIC1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.797C>G | p.Ala266Gly | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000477858.1 | Q14526-2 | ||
| HIC1 | TSL:1 | c.797C>G | p.Ala266Gly | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000382742.2 | Q14526-2 | ||
| HIC1 | TSL:5 | c.854C>G | p.Ala285Gly | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000314080.3 | Q14526-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000546 AC: 83AN: 151906Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000457 AC: 39AN: 85382 AF XY: 0.000413 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000963 AC: 1283AN: 1332052Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000906 AC XY: 595AN XY: 656712 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000546 AC: 83AN: 151906Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000512 AC XY: 38AN XY: 74204 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at