17-31181757-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The ENST00000358273.9(NF1):​c.702G>A​(p.Leu234=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.665 in 1,604,776 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 363,710 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L234L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.57 ( 26997 hom., cov: 29)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.68 ( 336713 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
ENST00000358273.9 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.86
Variant links:
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 17-31181757-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31181757-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 183825.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-31181757-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.86 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.699 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NF1NM_001042492.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.702G>A p.Leu234= synonymous_variant 7/58 ENST00000358273.9 NP_001035957.1
NF1NM_000267.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.702G>A p.Leu234= synonymous_variant 7/57 NP_000258.1
NF1NM_001128147.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.702G>A p.Leu234= synonymous_variant 7/15 NP_001121619.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NF1ENST00000358273.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.702G>A p.Leu234= synonymous_variant 7/581 NM_001042492.3 ENSP00000351015 P1P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.572
AC:
86258
AN:
150814
Hom.:
26990
Cov.:
29
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.303
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.720
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.565
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.768
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.562
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.627
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.660
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.779
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.704
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.631
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.627
AC:
157498
AN:
251116
Hom.:
51250
AF XY:
0.643
AC XY:
87246
AN XY:
135778
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.290
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.507
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.776
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.561
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.635
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.662
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.698
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.671
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.675
AC:
981504
AN:
1453854
Hom.:
336713
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.676
AC XY:
489500
AN XY:
723658
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.286
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.516
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.775
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.555
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.637
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.657
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.699
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.669
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.572
AC:
86299
AN:
150922
Hom.:
26997
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.568
AC XY:
41858
AN XY:
73630
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.304
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.565
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.768
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.562
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.626
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.660
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.704
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.632
Alfa
AF:
0.679
Hom.:
50180
Bravo
AF:
0.554
Asia WGS
AF:
0.578
AC:
2007
AN:
3472
EpiCase
AF:
0.720
EpiControl
AF:
0.721

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 18, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 02, 2014This is a RefSeq error. The reference base (c.702G) is the minor allele. The c.7 02A allele has been identified in 70% (46585/66678) of European chromosomes by t he Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org, dbSNP rs1 801052) and thus meets criteria to be classified as benign. -
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 11, 2016Variant summary: The NF1 c.702G>A (p.Leu234Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant and 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 75516/121252 control chromosomes (24613 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.6228021, signifying it is the common allele in the population and is thus a benign polymorphism. In addition, one clinical diagnostic laboratories has classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 30, 2023- -
Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Dec 09, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 17, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 11, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
0.042
DANN
Benign
0.65

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1801052; hg19: chr17-29508775; COSMIC: COSV62193259; API