rs1801052

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):​c.702G>A​(p.Leu234Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.665 in 1,604,776 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 363,710 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L234L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.57 ( 26997 hom., cov: 29)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.68 ( 336713 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.86

Publications

74 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
NF1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • neurofibromatosis type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
  • Moyamoya disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 17-31181757-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31181757-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 183825.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.86 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.699 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NF1NM_001042492.3 linkc.702G>A p.Leu234Leu synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 58 ENST00000358273.9 NP_001035957.1 P21359-1
NF1NM_000267.4 linkc.702G>A p.Leu234Leu synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 57 NP_000258.1 P21359-2
NF1NM_001128147.3 linkc.702G>A p.Leu234Leu synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 15 NP_001121619.1 P21359-5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NF1ENST00000358273.9 linkc.702G>A p.Leu234Leu synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 58 1 NM_001042492.3 ENSP00000351015.4 P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.572
AC:
86258
AN:
150814
Hom.:
26990
Cov.:
29
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.303
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.720
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.565
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.768
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.562
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.627
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.660
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.779
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.704
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.631
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.627
AC:
157498
AN:
251116
AF XY:
0.643
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.290
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.507
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.776
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.561
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.662
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.698
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.671
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.675
AC:
981504
AN:
1453854
Hom.:
336713
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.676
AC XY:
489500
AN XY:
723658
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.286
AC:
9522
AN:
33334
American (AMR)
AF:
0.516
AC:
23060
AN:
44682
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.775
AC:
20198
AN:
26060
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.555
AC:
21964
AN:
39556
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.637
AC:
54841
AN:
86034
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.657
AC:
35068
AN:
53406
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.768
AC:
4374
AN:
5698
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.699
AC:
772272
AN:
1104988
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.669
AC:
40205
AN:
60096
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.451
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14836
29672
44509
59345
74181
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
19292
38584
57876
77168
96460
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.572
AC:
86299
AN:
150922
Hom.:
26997
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.568
AC XY:
41858
AN XY:
73630
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.304
AC:
12476
AN:
41056
American (AMR)
AF:
0.565
AC:
8575
AN:
15174
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.768
AC:
2664
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.562
AC:
2872
AN:
5114
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.626
AC:
3003
AN:
4796
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.660
AC:
6731
AN:
10194
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.777
AC:
227
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.704
AC:
47768
AN:
67816
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.632
AC:
1328
AN:
2102
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1579
3157
4736
6314
7893
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
718
1436
2154
2872
3590
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.647
Hom.:
82021
Bravo
AF:
0.554
Asia WGS
AF:
0.578
AC:
2007
AN:
3472
EpiCase
AF:
0.720
EpiControl
AF:
0.721

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 02, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This is a RefSeq error. The reference base (c.702G) is the minor allele. The c.7 02A allele has been identified in 70% (46585/66678) of European chromosomes by t he Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org, dbSNP rs1 801052) and thus meets criteria to be classified as benign. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 18, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:4
Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 26, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 11, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The NF1 c.702G>A (p.Leu234Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant and 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 75516/121252 control chromosomes (24613 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.6228021, signifying it is the common allele in the population and is thus a benign polymorphism. In addition, one clinical diagnostic laboratories has classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Benign:2
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Dec 09, 2019
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Oct 17, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 11, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
0.042
DANN
Benign
0.65
PhyloP100
-1.9
PromoterAI
-0.0086
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=80/20
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1801052; hg19: chr17-29508775; COSMIC: COSV62193259; API