17-31325914-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 19 ACMG points: 19P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.4930G>T(p.Asp1644Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D1644G) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042492.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NF1 | NM_001042492.3 | c.4930G>T | p.Asp1644Tyr | missense_variant | 37/58 | ENST00000358273.9 | NP_001035957.1 | |
NF1 | NM_000267.3 | c.4867G>T | p.Asp1623Tyr | missense_variant | 36/57 | NP_000258.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NF1 | ENST00000358273.9 | c.4930G>T | p.Asp1644Tyr | missense_variant | 37/58 | 1 | NM_001042492.3 | ENSP00000351015.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Apr 15, 2022 | In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 1623 of the NF1 protein (p.Asp1623Tyr). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with NF1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 429003). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt NF1 protein function. This variant disrupts the p.Asp1623 amino acid residue in NF1. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 23913538; Invitae). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 27, 2024 | The p.D1623Y variant (also known as c.4867G>T), located in coding exon 36 of the NF1 gene, results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 4867. The aspartic acid at codon 1623 is replaced by tyrosine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This variant has been reported in multiple patients with a clinical diagnosis or symptoms of NF1 (van Minkelen R et al. Clin. Genet., 2014 Apr;85:318-27; Ambry internal data). Different amino acid substitutions at the same position have also been identified in NF1 patients in other studies (Sabbagh A et al. Hum. Mutat., 2013 Nov;34:1510-8; Bianchessi D et al. Mol Genet Genomic Med, 2015 Nov;3:513-25). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at