17-31334883-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.5858T>C(p.Leu1953Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L1953V) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042492.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neurofibromatosis type 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
- Moyamoya diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF1 | ENST00000358273.9 | c.5858T>C | p.Leu1953Pro | missense_variant | Exon 40 of 58 | 1 | NM_001042492.3 | ENSP00000351015.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 29
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 29
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Pathogenic:3
This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 1932 of the NF1 protein (p.Leu1932Pro). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with neurofibromatosis type 1 and/or NF1-related conditions (PMID: 2114220, 12522551, 31776437; Invitae). In at least one individual the variant was observed to be de novo. This variant is also known as 1045C>T. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 334). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt NF1 protein function. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic.
not provided Uncertain:1Other:1
Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12522551, 2114220, 31776437)
Neurocutaneous syndrome Pathogenic:1
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Pathogenic:1
The p.L1932P pathogenic mutation (also known as c.5795T>C), located in coding exon 39 of the NF1 gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 5795. The leucine at codon 1932 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant was reported in individual(s) with features consistent with neurofibromatosis type 1 (Cawthon RM et al. Cell, 1990 Jul;62:193-201; Wang Q et al. Hum Genet, 2003 Feb;112:117-23; Nasi L et al. Acta Derm Venereol, 2023 Jun;103:adv5758; Kang E et al. J Hum Genet, 2020 Jan;65:79-89; Ambry internal data). This missense alteration is located in a region that has a low rate of benign missense variation (Lek M et al. Nature. 2016 Aug 18;536(7616):285-91; DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans using Ensembl Resources. Firth H.V. et al. 2009. Am.J.Hum.Genet. 84, 524-533 (DOI: dx.doi.org/10/1016/j.ajhg.2009.03.010)). In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. This variant is considered to be rare based on population cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Based on the supporting evidence, this variant is interpreted as a disease-causing mutation.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at