17-39666058-A-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_003673.4(TCAP):ā€‹c.453A>Cā€‹(p.Ala151Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.703 in 1,605,596 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 402,445 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.61 ( 30100 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.71 ( 372345 hom. )

Consequence

TCAP
NM_003673.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0300
Variant links:
Genes affected
TCAP (HGNC:11610): (titin-cap) Sarcomere assembly is regulated by the muscle protein titin. Titin is a giant elastic protein with kinase activity that extends half the length of a sarcomere. It serves as a scaffold to which myofibrils and other muscle related proteins are attached. This gene encodes a protein found in striated and cardiac muscle that binds to the titin Z1-Z2 domains and is a substrate of titin kinase, interactions thought to be critical to sarcomere assembly. Mutations in this gene are associated with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2G. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 17-39666058-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-39666058-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44709.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-39666058-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.03 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.711 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TCAPNM_003673.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.453A>C p.Ala151Ala synonymous_variant 2/2 ENST00000309889.3 NP_003664.1 O15273A2TDC0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TCAPENST00000309889.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.453A>C p.Ala151Ala synonymous_variant 2/21 NM_003673.4 ENSP00000312624.2 O15273
TCAPENST00000578283.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.381A>C p.Ala127Ala synonymous_variant 3/35 ENSP00000462787.1 J3KT40

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.615
AC:
93445
AN:
151980
Hom.:
30076
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.432
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.791
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.582
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.691
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.418
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.712
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.737
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.649
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.716
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.626
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.668
AC:
163064
AN:
244274
Hom.:
56140
AF XY:
0.681
AC XY:
90533
AN XY:
132902
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.434
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.620
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.706
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.388
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.742
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.740
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.726
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.689
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.712
AC:
1034841
AN:
1453498
Hom.:
372345
Cov.:
74
AF XY:
0.714
AC XY:
516150
AN XY:
723394
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.427
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.616
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.698
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.461
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.747
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.736
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.731
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.693
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.615
AC:
93523
AN:
152098
Hom.:
30100
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.614
AC XY:
45614
AN XY:
74350
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.432
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.582
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.691
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.418
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.712
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.737
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.716
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.628
Alfa
AF:
0.695
Hom.:
39297
Bravo
AF:
0.595
Asia WGS
AF:
0.624
AC:
2169
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.728
EpiControl
AF:
0.720

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:10
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 31, 2012This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJul 20, 2011- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 15, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 14, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 25 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2G Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 12, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy;C4225408:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 25 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
7.6
DANN
Benign
0.76

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1053651; hg19: chr17-37822311; COSMIC: COSV54092463; COSMIC: COSV54092463; API