rs1053651

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_003673.4(TCAP):c.453A>C(p.Ala151Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.703 in 1,605,596 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 402,445 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.61 ( 30100 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.71 ( 372345 hom. )

Consequence

TCAP
NM_003673.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0300

Variant links:

Genes affected

TCAP (HGNC:11610): (titin-cap) Sarcomere assembly is regulated by the muscle protein titin. Titin is a giant elastic protein with kinase activity that extends half the length of a sarcomere. It serves as a scaffold to which myofibrils and other muscle related proteins are attached. This gene encodes a protein found in striated and cardiac muscle that binds to the titin Z1-Z2 domains and is a substrate of titin kinase, interactions thought to be critical to sarcomere assembly. Mutations in this gene are associated with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2G. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TCAP links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).

BP6

Variant 17-39666058-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-39666058-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44709.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-39666058-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.03 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.711 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TCAP	NM_003673.4 link	c.453A>C	p.Ala151Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 2	ENST00000309889.3	NP_003664.1	O15273A2TDC0

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TCAP	ENST00000309889.3 link	c.453A>C	p.Ala151Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 2	1	NM_003673.4	ENSP00000312624.2		O15273
TCAP	ENST00000578283.1 link	c.381A>C	p.Ala127Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 3	5		ENSP00000462787.1		J3KT40

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.615

AC:

93445

AN:

151980

Hom.:

30076

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.432

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.791

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.582

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.691

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.418

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.712

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.737

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.649

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.716

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.626

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.668

AC:

163064

AN:

244274

Hom.:

56140

AF XY:

0.681

AC XY:

90533

AN XY:

132902

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.434

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.620

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.706

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.388

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.742

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.740

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.726

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.689

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.712

AC:

1034841

AN:

1453498

Hom.:

372345

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.714

AC XY:

516150

AN XY:

723394

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.427

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.616

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.698

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.461

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.747

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.736

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.731

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.693

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.615

AC:

93523

AN:

152098

Hom.:

30100

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.614

AC XY:

45614

AN XY:

74350

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.432

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.582

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.691

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.418

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.712

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.737

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.716

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.628

Alfa

AF:

0.695

Hom.:

39297

Bravo

AF:

0.595

Asia WGS

AF:

0.624

AC:

2169

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.728

EpiControl

AF:

0.720

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:17

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:10

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 20, 2011

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 31, 2012

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 15, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 14, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 25

Benign:2

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2G

Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jun 12, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy;C4225408:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 25

Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.73

CADD

Benign

7.6

DANN

Benign

0.76

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over