17-43071031-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.4883T>C(p.Met1628Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00096 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00110 AC: 168AN: 152140Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00147 AC: 370AN: 251392Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00127 AC XY: 173AN XY: 135874
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000945 AC: 1382AN: 1461890Hom.: 9 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000949 AC XY: 690AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00110 AC: 168AN: 152258Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00149 AC XY: 111AN XY: 74436
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Apr 21, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Mar 07, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000495. Also class 1 based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.01399 (Asian), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Jul 28, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:6Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 29, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.8% (51/6614) Finnish; ClinVar: 6 B/LB - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Dec 29, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 22, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Dec 01, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 30, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 12, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | BRCA1: BP4, BS1 - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 04, 2025 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Feb 27, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 24, 2022 | - - |
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jun 01, 2014 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 p.Met1628Thr variant was identified in at least 105 of 111464 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer, and was present in 55 of 1140 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.048) (Inoue 1995, Judkins 2005, Ostrow 2004, Phelan 2004, Tavtigian 2006, Tamboom 2010). The variant was listed in dbSNP (ID: rs4986854) “With untested allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.004 (1000 Genomes Project); in HapMap-JPT cohort with a frequency of 0.041, and the PAC1 cohort with a frequency of 0.21; and Inoue (1995) found the variant allele at a frequency of 0.39 in a Japanese group of healthy control individuals. The identification of the variant in these population cohorts increases the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The variant was also identified in HGMD, LOVD, the BIC database (96X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (4X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA2 variant (c.4576dup (p.Thr1526AsnfsX3)), and Judkins (2005) observed the variant in trans with three different pathogenic BRCA1 mutations, increasing the likelihood that the p.Met1628Thr variant does not have clinical significance. In addition, a study by Phelan (2004) found that the variant did not segregate with disease in one family, and two functional studies showed no showed no effect of the variant on transcriptional activation (Phelan 2004, Ostrow 2004). Furthermore, Myriad classifies this variant as a polymorphism (personal communication). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 10, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at