17-43071031-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.4883T>C​(p.Met1628Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00096 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00095 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

3
15

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:28O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.667
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015231997).
BP6
Variant 17-43071031-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43071031-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41828.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43071031-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0011 (168/152258) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00887 (46/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00683. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 111 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkc.4883T>C p.Met1628Thr missense_variant 15/23 ENST00000357654.9 NP_009225.1 P38398-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkc.4883T>C p.Met1628Thr missense_variant 15/231 NM_007294.4 ENSP00000350283.3 P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00110
AC:
168
AN:
152140
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00692
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00885
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00754
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00147
AC:
370
AN:
251392
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00127
AC XY:
173
AN XY:
135874
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00486
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00430
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000425
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00739
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00277
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000945
AC:
1382
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000949
AC XY:
690
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00551
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0128
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000429
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00777
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000183
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00113
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00110
AC:
168
AN:
152258
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00149
AC XY:
111
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00692
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00887
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00754
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000698
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.000351
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.00152
AC:
185
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00924
AC:
32
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:28Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganApr 21, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylMar 07, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)May 29, 2002- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000495. Also class 1 based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.01399 (Asian), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtJul 28, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
not specified Benign:6Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 29, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.8% (51/6614) Finnish; ClinVar: 6 B/LB -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioDec 29, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoNov 22, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsDec 01, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 30, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Oct 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMar 12, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2024BRCA1: BP4, BS1 -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 04, 2025- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Feb 27, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 24, 2022- -
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonJun 01, 2014- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA1 p.Met1628Thr variant was identified in at least 105 of 111464 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer, and was present in 55 of 1140 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.048) (Inoue 1995, Judkins 2005, Ostrow 2004, Phelan 2004, Tavtigian 2006, Tamboom 2010). The variant was listed in dbSNP (ID: rs4986854) “With untested allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.004 (1000 Genomes Project); in HapMap-JPT cohort with a frequency of 0.041, and the PAC1 cohort with a frequency of 0.21; and Inoue (1995) found the variant allele at a frequency of 0.39 in a Japanese group of healthy control individuals. The identification of the variant in these population cohorts increases the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The variant was also identified in HGMD, LOVD, the BIC database (96X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (4X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA2 variant (c.4576dup (p.Thr1526AsnfsX3)), and Judkins (2005) observed the variant in trans with three different pathogenic BRCA1 mutations, increasing the likelihood that the p.Met1628Thr variant does not have clinical significance. In addition, a study by Phelan (2004) found that the variant did not segregate with disease in one family, and two functional studies showed no showed no effect of the variant on transcriptional activation (Phelan 2004, Ostrow 2004). Furthermore, Myriad classifies this variant as a polymorphism (personal communication). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 10, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.074
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.10
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.080
CADD
Benign
0.056
DANN
Benign
0.18
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.091
.;T;.;.;T;.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.4
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.4
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.026
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.86
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.75
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
.;L;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.59
N;N;.;N;.;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.49
Sift
Benign
0.56
T;T;.;T;.;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.29
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.;.;T
Polyphen
0.039, 0.0030
.;B;.;.;.;.;.;.;B;.
Vest4
0.26
MVP
0.39
MPC
0.094
ClinPred
0.0046
T
GERP RS
-2.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.031
gMVP
0.18

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4986854; hg19: chr17-41223048; API