chr17-43071031-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.4883T>C​(p.Met1628Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00096 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M1628V) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00095 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

3
14

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:30O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.667

Publications

76 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • Fanconi anemia, complementation group S
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015231997).
BP6
Variant 17-43071031-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43071031-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 41828.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0011 (168/152258) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00887 (46/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00683. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 111 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR,AD gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_007294.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BRCA1
NM_007294.4
MANE Select
c.4883T>Cp.Met1628Thr
missense
Exon 15 of 23NP_009225.1
BRCA1
NM_001407581.1
c.4949T>Cp.Met1650Thr
missense
Exon 16 of 24NP_001394510.1
BRCA1
NM_001407582.1
c.4949T>Cp.Met1650Thr
missense
Exon 16 of 24NP_001394511.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BRCA1
ENST00000357654.9
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.4883T>Cp.Met1628Thr
missense
Exon 15 of 23ENSP00000350283.3
BRCA1
ENST00000471181.7
TSL:1
c.4946T>Cp.Met1649Thr
missense
Exon 16 of 24ENSP00000418960.2
BRCA1
ENST00000470026.6
TSL:1
c.4883T>Cp.Met1628Thr
missense
Exon 15 of 23ENSP00000419274.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00110
AC:
168
AN:
152140
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00692
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00885
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00754
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00147
AC:
370
AN:
251392
AF XY:
0.00127
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00486
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00430
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00739
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00277
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000945
AC:
1382
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000949
AC XY:
690
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00551
AC:
144
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0128
AC:
509
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000429
AC:
37
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00777
AC:
415
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000867
AC:
5
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000183
AC:
204
AN:
1112012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00113
AC:
68
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
95
190
285
380
475
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00110
AC:
168
AN:
152258
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00149
AC XY:
111
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00692
AC:
24
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00887
AC:
46
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000415
AC:
2
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00754
AC:
80
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000235
AC:
16
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8
15
23
30
38
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000861
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.000351
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.00152
AC:
185
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00924
AC:
32
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:30Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:9
May 29, 2002
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 28, 2017
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 10, 2015
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000495. Also class 1 based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.01399 (Asian), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30).

Mar 07, 2014
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

Mar 02, 2020
BRCAlab, Lund University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 21, 2016
Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign.

not specified Benign:6Other:1
Nov 22, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.8% (51/6614) Finnish; ClinVar: 6 B/LB

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

Dec 29, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Dec 01, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Dec 30, 2014
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 16, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

not provided Benign:3
Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

Sep 03, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRCA1: BP4, BS1

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Feb 27, 2024
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Nov 24, 2016
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Jun 01, 2014
CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
May 24, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA1 p.Met1628Thr variant was identified in at least 105 of 111464 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer, and was present in 55 of 1140 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.048) (Inoue 1995, Judkins 2005, Ostrow 2004, Phelan 2004, Tavtigian 2006, Tamboom 2010). The variant was listed in dbSNP (ID: rs4986854) “With untested allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.004 (1000 Genomes Project); in HapMap-JPT cohort with a frequency of 0.041, and the PAC1 cohort with a frequency of 0.21; and Inoue (1995) found the variant allele at a frequency of 0.39 in a Japanese group of healthy control individuals. The identification of the variant in these population cohorts increases the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The variant was also identified in HGMD, LOVD, the BIC database (96X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (4X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA2 variant (c.4576dup (p.Thr1526AsnfsX3)), and Judkins (2005) observed the variant in trans with three different pathogenic BRCA1 mutations, increasing the likelihood that the p.Met1628Thr variant does not have clinical significance. In addition, a study by Phelan (2004) found that the variant did not segregate with disease in one family, and two functional studies showed no showed no effect of the variant on transcriptional activation (Phelan 2004, Ostrow 2004). Furthermore, Myriad classifies this variant as a polymorphism (personal communication). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign.

BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 10, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.074
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.10
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.080
CADD
Benign
0.056
DANN
Benign
0.18
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.091
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.4
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.4
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.026
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.86
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.75
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L
PhyloP100
-0.67
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.59
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.49
Sift
Benign
0.56
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.29
T
Polyphen
0.039
B
Vest4
0.26
MVP
0.39
MPC
0.094
ClinPred
0.0046
T
GERP RS
-2.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.031
gMVP
0.18
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4986854; hg19: chr17-41223048; API