Menu
GeneBe

17-43091923-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.3608G>A(p.Arg1203Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000663 in 1,614,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1203G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000067 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:3B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.147
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0219976).
BP6
Variant 17-43091923-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43091923-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 54935.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43091923-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43091923-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3608G>A p.Arg1203Gln missense_variant 10/23 ENST00000357654.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.3608G>A p.Arg1203Gln missense_variant 10/231 NM_007294.4 P4P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000591
AC:
9
AN:
152214
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000478
AC:
12
AN:
251078
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000516
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135732
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000881
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000670
AC:
98
AN:
1461808
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000770
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000719
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000591
AC:
9
AN:
152214
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000807
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74364
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000377
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000577
AC:
7
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:14
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)May 29, 2002- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylAug 10, 2016- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000365 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPathway GenomicsOct 30, 2014- -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 21, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 19, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21990134, 20104584, 21218378, 18284688, 19471317, 21520273, 21120943, 15447980, 15235020, 25011685, 22753008, 17924331, 27376475, 25948282, 18273839, 15983021, 23704879, 16267036, 15385441, 33087888) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2024BRCA1: BP1, BP4, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 04, 2021Variant summary: BRCA1 c.3608G>A (p.Arg1203Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.8e-05 in 251078 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (4.8e-05 vs 0.001), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.3608G>A has been widely reported in the literature in individuals undergoing sequence based analysis for Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Multifactorial probability models have classified this variant as neutral/benign with an IARC classification of 1 (benign) (example, Easton_2007, Lindor_2012, Lyra_2021). At-least two co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported in the BIC database and observed at our laboratory (BIC, BRCA2 c.778_779delGA, p.Glu260Serfs; Our lab, BRIP1 c.890delA, p.Lys297fs), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories and an expert panel (ENIGMA) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and a majority consensus leaning towards benign/likely benign (n=6). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaJul 15, 2015- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 30, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 30, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.070
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.15
Cadd
Benign
0.050
Dann
Benign
0.36
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.099
T;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-2.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.022
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.77
T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.038
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.022
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.91
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.9
N;N;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.18
T
PROVEAN
Benign
1.7
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.41
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.25
MutPred
0.62
Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0254);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0254);.;Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0254);
MVP
0.27
MPC
0.093
ClinPred
0.021
T
GERP RS
-8.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.0083
gMVP
0.051

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55930959; hg19: chr17-41243940; COSMIC: COSV58794111; COSMIC: COSV58794111; API