17-43115746-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.114G>A(p.Lys38=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.002 in 1,613,626 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 89 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 80 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA1
NM_007294.4 synonymous
NM_007294.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.475
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 17-43115746-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43115746-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 54146.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43115746-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43115746-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.475 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.053 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.114G>A | p.Lys38= | synonymous_variant | 3/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.114G>A | p.Lys38= | synonymous_variant | 3/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00296 AC: 450AN: 152104Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
450
AN:
152104
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00444 AC: 1113AN: 250826Hom.: 19 AF XY: 0.00362 AC XY: 491AN XY: 135586
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1113
AN:
250826
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
491
AN XY:
135586
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00190 AC: 2773AN: 1461404Hom.: 80 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00180 AC XY: 1306AN XY: 726984
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2773
AN:
1461404
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
1306
AN XY:
726984
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00295 AC: 449AN: 152222Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00376 AC XY: 280AN XY: 74418
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
449
AN:
152222
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
280
AN XY:
74418
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
52
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:32Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:10
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 15, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency | Apr 18, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 28, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 p.Lys38= variant was identified in 16 of 604 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.026) from Asian and Colombian individuals or families with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer or early-onset breast cancer and was present in 3 of 142 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.021) from healthy individuals (Torres_2007_17080309, Ho_2000_10951344, Chen_2003_12602912, Song_2006_16835750, Toh_2008_18431501). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1800062) as “With Uncertain significance, other allele”, ClinVar and Clinvitae (11x classified as benign by ENIGMA, Laboratory Corporation of America, Baylor Miraca Genetics, British Columbia Cancer Agency (COGR), Sinai Health System (COGR), ARUP Laboratories, Invitae, Counsyl, Ambry Genetics, SCRP, BIC; 2x classified as likely benign by Illumina Clinical Services and CHEO), GeneInsight-COGR (classified as likely benign/benign by COGR consensus and Sinai Health System), LOVD 3.0 (11 entries, classified as does not affect function or not classified), UMD-LSDB (37 entries, 2 of which have co-occurring pathogenic variants), BIC Database (18 entries, classified as not pathogenic), and the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (5 entries classified as no known pathogenicity). The variant was not identified in the COSMIC, MutDB, or ARUP Laboratories databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 1135 of 276592 chromosomes (18 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.004 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 4 of 23984 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Other in 13 of 6450 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Latino in 368 of 34346 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), European Non-Finnish in 2 of 126380 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), East Asian in 741 of 18846 chromosomes (freq: 0.04), European Finnish in 1 of 25776 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), and South Asian in 6 of 30688 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002) while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The p.Lys38= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneKor MSA | Nov 01, 2017 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:6Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Mar 03, 2011 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | Jul 19, 2006 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jan 12, 2015 | Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.05769 (Asian), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Mar 13, 2014 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | in vitro | Brotman Baty Institute, University of Washington | - | - - |
not provided Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2023 | BRCA1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Dec 19, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 11, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 13, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Sep 13, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer | Nov 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 19, 2014 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Nov 09, 2021 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Feb 23, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at