17-43115746-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.114G>A​(p.Lys38=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.002 in 1,613,626 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 89 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 80 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:31O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.475
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 17-43115746-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43115746-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 54146.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43115746-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43115746-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.475 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.053 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.114G>A p.Lys38= synonymous_variant 3/23 ENST00000357654.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.114G>A p.Lys38= synonymous_variant 3/231 NM_007294.4 P4P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00296
AC:
450
AN:
152104
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0443
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000620
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00444
AC:
1113
AN:
250826
Hom.:
19
AF XY:
0.00362
AC XY:
491
AN XY:
135586
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0393
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000164
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000882
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00278
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00190
AC:
2773
AN:
1461404
Hom.:
80
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00180
AC XY:
1306
AN XY:
726984
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000269
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00965
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0550
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000989
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00200
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00295
AC:
449
AN:
152222
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00376
AC XY:
280
AN XY:
74418
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000337
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0442
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000474
Alfa
AF:
0.000289
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00320
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0150
AC:
52
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:31Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:10
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA1 p.Lys38= variant was identified in 16 of 604 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.026) from Asian and Colombian individuals or families with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer or early-onset breast cancer and was present in 3 of 142 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.021) from healthy individuals (Torres_2007_17080309, Ho_2000_10951344, Chen_2003_12602912, Song_2006_16835750, Toh_2008_18431501). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1800062) as “With Uncertain significance, other allele”, ClinVar and Clinvitae (11x classified as benign by ENIGMA, Laboratory Corporation of America, Baylor Miraca Genetics, British Columbia Cancer Agency (COGR), Sinai Health System (COGR), ARUP Laboratories, Invitae, Counsyl, Ambry Genetics, SCRP, BIC; 2x classified as likely benign by Illumina Clinical Services and CHEO), GeneInsight-COGR (classified as likely benign/benign by COGR consensus and Sinai Health System), LOVD 3.0 (11 entries, classified as does not affect function or not classified), UMD-LSDB (37 entries, 2 of which have co-occurring pathogenic variants), BIC Database (18 entries, classified as not pathogenic), and the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (5 entries classified as no known pathogenicity). The variant was not identified in the COSMIC, MutDB, or ARUP Laboratories databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 1135 of 276592 chromosomes (18 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.004 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 4 of 23984 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Other in 13 of 6450 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Latino in 368 of 34346 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), European Non-Finnish in 2 of 126380 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), East Asian in 741 of 18846 chromosomes (freq: 0.04), European Finnish in 1 of 25776 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), and South Asian in 6 of 30688 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002) while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The p.Lys38= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneKor MSANov 01, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer AgencyApr 18, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 28, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 15, 2020- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:6Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)Jul 19, 2006- -
not provided, no classification providedin vitroBrotman Baty Institute, University of Washington-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylMar 13, 2014- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jan 12, 2015Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.05769 (Asian), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Mar 03, 2011- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicDec 19, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenDec 01, 2023BRCA1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 11, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 13, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsSep 13, 2017- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 19, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioNov 09, 2021- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsFeb 23, 2017- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
5.2
DANN
Benign
0.54

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800062; hg19: chr17-41267763; API