17-5381385-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_004703.6(RABEP1):c.2371-4T>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0114 in 1,605,954 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 106 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004703.6 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RABEP1 | NM_004703.6 | c.2371-4T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000537505.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RABEP1 | ENST00000537505.6 | c.2371-4T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_004703.6 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00850 AC: 1294AN: 152226Hom.: 11 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00843 AC: 2032AN: 240972Hom.: 13 AF XY: 0.00838 AC XY: 1095AN XY: 130636
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0117 AC: 17008AN: 1453610Hom.: 95 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0115 AC XY: 8279AN XY: 722692
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00849 AC: 1294AN: 152344Hom.: 11 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00803 AC XY: 598AN XY: 74500
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 17, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at