17-58206088-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001321269.2(MKS1):ā€‹c.1588G>Cā€‹(p.Gly530Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0336 in 1,611,270 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,584 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/6 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.063 ( 559 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.030 ( 1025 hom. )

Consequence

MKS1
NM_001321269.2 missense

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.318
Variant links:
Genes affected
MKS1 (HGNC:7121): (MKS transition zone complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the basal body and is required for formation of the primary cilium in ciliated epithelial cells. Mutations in this gene result in Meckel syndrome type 1 and in Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 13. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 17-58206088-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-58206088-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 126272.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-58206088-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.149 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MKS1NM_017777.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1671G>C p.Leu557Leu synonymous_variant 18/18 ENST00000393119.7 NP_060247.2 Q9NXB0-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MKS1ENST00000393119.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1671G>C p.Leu557Leu synonymous_variant 18/181 NM_017777.4 ENSP00000376827.2 Q9NXB0-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0634
AC:
9638
AN:
152080
Hom.:
557
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.153
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0363
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0671
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00791
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0226
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0296
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0277
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0657
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0369
AC:
8919
AN:
241980
Hom.:
270
AF XY:
0.0353
AC XY:
4657
AN XY:
131758
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.156
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0263
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0718
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00635
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0290
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0276
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0293
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0455
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0304
AC:
44418
AN:
1459072
Hom.:
1025
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0303
AC XY:
21959
AN XY:
725694
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.159
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0289
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0699
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0128
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0291
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0303
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0258
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0391
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0634
AC:
9645
AN:
152198
Hom.:
559
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0626
AC XY:
4655
AN XY:
74414
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.153
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0363
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0671
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00793
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0224
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0296
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0277
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0650
Alfa
AF:
0.0253
Hom.:
16
Bravo
AF:
0.0686
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0200
AC:
70
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 20, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Meckel syndrome, type 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 08, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 13 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 08, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
0.81
DANN
Benign
0.59

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11548967; hg19: chr17-56283449; COSMIC: COSV105044206; COSMIC: COSV105044206; API