17-61847211-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):c.517C>T(p.Arg173Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0048 in 1,613,594 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0049 ( 27 hom. )
Consequence
BRIP1
NM_032043.3 missense
NM_032043.3 missense
Scores
1
12
6
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.08
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007955372).
BP6
Variant 17-61847211-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61847211-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 133761.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=9, Uncertain_significance=2, not_provided=1, Benign=10}. Variant chr17-61847211-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00354 (539/152216) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00551 (375/68024). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00505. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 254 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | NM_032043.3 | c.517C>T | p.Arg173Cys | missense_variant | 6/20 | ENST00000259008.7 | NP_114432.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | ENST00000259008.7 | c.517C>T | p.Arg173Cys | missense_variant | 6/20 | 1 | NM_032043.3 | ENSP00000259008.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00354 AC: 539AN: 152098Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
539
AN:
152098
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00261 AC: 656AN: 251292Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00269 AC XY: 365AN XY: 135830
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
656
AN:
251292
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
365
AN XY:
135830
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00494 AC: 7214AN: 1461378Hom.: 27 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00472 AC XY: 3431AN XY: 727044
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
7214
AN:
1461378
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
3431
AN XY:
727044
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00354 AC: 539AN: 152216Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00341 AC XY: 254AN XY: 74398
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
539
AN:
152216
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
254
AN XY:
74398
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
21
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
24
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
5
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
42
ExAC
AF:
AC:
328
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:22Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 02, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 10, 2017 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 15, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 02, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 04, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 20, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Oct 31, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Sep 27, 2021 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 01, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Apr 18, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | BRIP1: BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 21, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 18, 2023 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 08, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jun 29, 2023 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRIP1 p.Arg173Cys variant was identified in 2 of 448 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from individuals or families with breast and ovarian cancer and was present in 2 of 246 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.008) from healthy individuals (Lewis 2005, Rutter 2003, Wong 2011). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs4988345) as “other”; in the ClinVar database as benign by Invitae, GeneDx and Ambry genetics, and likely benign by Emory Genetics and Counsyl; and was identified in the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database 5x. The variant was not identified in the Cosmic and MutDB databases. In addition, the variant was identified in control databases in 737 (2 homozygous) of 277072 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). One study indicates that the rare variant p.Arg173Cys impairs protein translocation to the nucleus and might modify breast cancer susceptibility. Since the minor allele for this variant is very rare (MAF= 0.008) in Centre d’Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH) samples, there was very limited evidence to confirm or refute this association using the case-control population in their current research (Song 2007). Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) analysis of the coding regions of these four genes was conducted on 75 non-BRCA1/2 index cases. Variants, c.517C>T, p.Arg173Cys) and c.3411T>C, p.Thr1137=, were all found in at least one control, indicating that they are likely to be benign (Lewis 2005). The p.Arg173 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 08, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;.
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D
Polyphen
D;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at