rs4988345

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):​c.517C>T​(p.Arg173Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0048 in 1,613,594 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R173S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0049 ( 27 hom. )

Consequence

BRIP1
NM_032043.3 missense

Scores

1
12
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:23O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.08

Publications

43 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
BRIP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Illumina
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group J
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • colorectal adenoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 29 uncertain in NM_032043.3
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007955372).
BP6
Variant 17-61847211-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61847211-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 133761.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00354 (539/152216) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00551 (375/68024). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00505. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 254 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRIP1NM_032043.3 linkc.517C>T p.Arg173Cys missense_variant Exon 6 of 20 ENST00000259008.7 NP_114432.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRIP1ENST00000259008.7 linkc.517C>T p.Arg173Cys missense_variant Exon 6 of 20 1 NM_032043.3 ENSP00000259008.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00354
AC:
539
AN:
152098
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0954
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00551
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00261
AC:
656
AN:
251292
AF XY:
0.00269
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000867
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00167
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00465
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00212
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00494
AC:
7214
AN:
1461378
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00472
AC XY:
3431
AN XY:
727044
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00120
AC:
40
AN:
33462
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
47
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39638
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000754
AC:
65
AN:
86248
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00234
AC:
125
AN:
53366
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
6
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00603
AC:
6699
AN:
1111674
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00383
AC:
231
AN:
60378
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.461
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
344
688
1031
1375
1719
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
264
528
792
1056
1320
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00354
AC:
539
AN:
152216
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00341
AC XY:
254
AN XY:
74398
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00106
AC:
44
AN:
41532
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000654
AC:
10
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000623
AC:
3
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00123
AC:
13
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00551
AC:
375
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00332
AC:
7
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
24
47
71
94
118
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00416
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.00356
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00566
AC:
21
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00623
AC:
24
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00113
AC:
5
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00488
AC:
42
ExAC
AF:
0.00270
AC:
328
EpiCase
AF:
0.00529
EpiControl
AF:
0.00462

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:23Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:6
Nov 04, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Nov 20, 2014
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 31, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 11, 2025
Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS2_Supporting, BP4 c.517C>T, located in exon 6 of the BRIP1 gene, is predicted to result in the substitution of arginine by cysteine at codon 173, p.(Arg173Cys). This variant is found in 691/268164 alleles (and 2 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.258% in the gnomAD v2.1.1 database, non-cancer dataset (BS2_Supporting). The SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing and the REVEL meta-predictor score for this variant (0.284) suggests that it does not affect the protein function according Pejaver 2022 thresholds (PMID: 36413997) (BP4). To our knowledge, neither relevant clinical data nor well-stablished functional studies have been reported for this variant. It has been reported in the ClinVar database (10x benign, 12x likely benign, 3x uncertain significance) and in the LOVD database (6x likely benign, 1x uncertain significance). Based on the currently available information, c.517C>T is classified as an uncertain significance variant according to ACMG guidelines. -

Sep 27, 2021
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:5Other:1
Mar 10, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

Dec 02, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jun 02, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 15, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:3
Apr 18, 2018
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRIP1: BS2 -

Aug 18, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 21, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group J Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jun 08, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Jun 29, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ovarian cancer Benign:1
Jun 08, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRIP1 p.Arg173Cys variant was identified in 2 of 448 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from individuals or families with breast and ovarian cancer and was present in 2 of 246 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.008) from healthy individuals (Lewis 2005, Rutter 2003, Wong 2011). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs4988345) as “other”; in the ClinVar database as benign by Invitae, GeneDx and Ambry genetics, and likely benign by Emory Genetics and Counsyl; and was identified in the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database 5x. The variant was not identified in the Cosmic and MutDB databases. In addition, the variant was identified in control databases in 737 (2 homozygous) of 277072 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). One study indicates that the rare variant p.Arg173Cys impairs protein translocation to the nucleus and might modify breast cancer susceptibility. Since the minor allele for this variant is very rare (MAF= 0.008) in Centre d’Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH) samples, there was very limited evidence to confirm or refute this association using the case-control population in their current research (Song 2007). Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) analysis of the coding regions of these four genes was conducted on 75 non-BRCA1/2 index cases. Variants, c.517C>T, p.Arg173Cys) and c.3411T>C, p.Thr1137=, were all found in at least one control, indicating that they are likely to be benign (Lewis 2005). The p.Arg173 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.23
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.097
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.090
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.55
D;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.66
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.63
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.92
D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.13
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0080
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.35
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.7
M;M
PhyloP100
4.1
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.28
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.
Vest4
0.51
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.36
ClinPred
0.033
T
GERP RS
5.3
PromoterAI
-0.10
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.19
gMVP
0.58
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicevardb
1.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4988345; hg19: chr17-59924572; COSMIC: COSV51995976; API