17-8003048-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PVS1PS1_ModeratePP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000180.4(GUCY2D):c.1A>G(p.Met1?) variant causes a start lost change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000437 in 1,373,874 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000180.4 start_lost
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cone-rod dystrophyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
- GUCY2D-related dominant retinopathyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- GUCY2D-related recessive retinopathyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Leber congenital amaurosis 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- cone-rod dystrophy 6Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- night blindness, congenital stationary, type1iInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Leber congenital amaurosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- central areolar choroidal dystrophyInheritance: AR, AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 18 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000180.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000437 AC: 6AN: 1373874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 677910 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at