17-80081958-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_017950.4(CCDC40):c.1889C>T(p.Ala630Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.106 in 1,613,548 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10,044 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A630A) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017950.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC40 | NM_017950.4 | c.1889C>T | p.Ala630Val | missense_variant | 12/20 | ENST00000397545.9 | NP_060420.2 | |
CCDC40 | NM_001243342.2 | c.1889C>T | p.Ala630Val | missense_variant | 12/18 | NP_001230271.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC40 | ENST00000397545.9 | c.1889C>T | p.Ala630Val | missense_variant | 12/20 | 5 | NM_017950.4 | ENSP00000380679 | P2 | |
CCDC40 | ENST00000574799.5 | n.1426C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 8/16 | 1 | |||||
CCDC40 | ENST00000374877.7 | c.1889C>T | p.Ala630Val | missense_variant | 12/18 | 5 | ENSP00000364011 | A2 | ||
CCDC40 | ENST00000572253.5 | n.516C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/6 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0854 AC: 12977AN: 151938Hom.: 642 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0901 AC: 22430AN: 248870Hom.: 1261 AF XY: 0.0934 AC XY: 12612AN XY: 135078
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.109 AC: 158777AN: 1461492Hom.: 9403 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.108 AC XY: 78411AN XY: 727040
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0853 AC: 12976AN: 152056Hom.: 641 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0844 AC XY: 6270AN XY: 74310
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 21, 2013 | Ala630Val in exon 12 of CCDC40: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 11.3% (21/186) of Finnish chromosom es from a broad population by the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/projects/SNP; dbSNP rs61749058). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 05, 2018 | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 07, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 15 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at