17-80105844-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000152.5(GAA):c.642C>T(p.Ser214Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.202 in 1,608,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35,416 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.17 ( 2499 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.21 ( 32917 hom. )

Consequence

GAA
NM_000152.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.21

Variant links:

Genes affected

GAA (HGNC:4065): (alpha glucosidase) This gene encodes lysosomal alpha-glucosidase, which is essential for the degradation of glycogen to glucose in lysosomes. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple intermediate forms and the mature form of the enzyme. Defects in this gene are the cause of glycogen storage disease II, also known as Pompe's disease, which is an autosomal recessive disorder with a broad clinical spectrum. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

GAA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).

BP6

Variant 17-80105844-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80105844-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 92487.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-80105844-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.21 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.218 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GAA	NM_000152.5 link	c.642C>T	p.Ser214Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 20	ENST00000302262.8	NP_000143.2	P10253

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GAA	ENST00000302262.8 link	c.642C>T	p.Ser214Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 20	1	NM_000152.5	ENSP00000305692.3		P10253

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.166

AC:

25227

AN:

152116

Hom.:

2502

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0740

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.172

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.136

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.296

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.167

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.249

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.288

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.221

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.172

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.178

AC:

43932

AN:

246290

Hom.:

4794

AF XY:

0.187

AC XY:

24966

AN XY:

133864

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0722

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0997

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.300

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.171

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.242

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.226

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.209

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.206

AC:

299792

AN:

1455914

Hom.:

32917

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.206

AC XY:

149517

AN XY:

724492

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0714

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.105

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.297

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000554

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.174

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.245

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.220

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.199

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.166

AC:

25225

AN:

152234

Hom.:

2499

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.165

AC XY:

12318

AN XY:

74432

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0741

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.136

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.296

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00135

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.165

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.249

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.221

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.171

Alfa

AF:

0.180

Hom.:

1058

Bravo

AF:

0.154

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0710

AC:

250

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:17

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:6

Aug 15, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 12, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Glycogen storage disease, type II

Benign:6

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2017

Phosphorus, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Oct 19, 2015

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Mar 08, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: This GAA c.642C>T variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in no amino acid change. 5/5 splice-site tools via Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing. This variant was found in 21664/120192 control chromosomes from ExAC at a frequency of 0.1802449, which is more than 42 times greater than the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0042205) in this gene, suggesting this variant is benign. The variant has been cited in at least one adult glycogen storage disease type II patient with an alternative genetic explanation for their disease. In addition, multiple clinical laboratories have classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant has been classified as Benign. -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Aug 12, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.69

CADD

Benign

0.40

DANN

Benign

0.94

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over