17-80278887-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_020914.5(RNF213):c.385G>T(p.Val129Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00784 in 1,537,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 61 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/12 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020914.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNF213 | NM_001256071.3 | c.261+5483G>T | intron_variant | ENST00000582970.6 | NP_001243000.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNF213 | ENST00000582970.6 | c.261+5483G>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_001256071.3 | ENSP00000464087.1 | ||||
RNF213 | ENST00000319921.4 | c.261+5483G>T | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000324392.4 | |||||
RNF213 | ENST00000508628.6 | c.385G>T | p.Val129Leu | missense_variant | 4/69 | 5 | ENSP00000425956.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00616 AC: 937AN: 152170Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00625 AC: 887AN: 141868Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00623 AC XY: 473AN XY: 75880
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00803 AC: 11116AN: 1384848Hom.: 53 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00774 AC XY: 5288AN XY: 683334
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00615 AC: 937AN: 152288Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00602 AC XY: 448AN XY: 74458
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2023 | RNF213: BS2 - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at