18-31520808-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_001943.5(DSG2):ā€‹c.222T>Cā€‹(p.His74=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000186 in 1,613,560 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DSG2
NM_001943.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.339
Variant links:
Genes affected
DSG2 (HGNC:3049): (desmoglein 2) This gene encodes a member of the desmoglein family and cadherin cell adhesion molecule superfamily of proteins. Desmogleins are calcium-binding transmembrane glycoprotein components of desmosomes, cell-cell junctions between epithelial, myocardial, and other cell types. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other desmoglein gene family members on chromosome 18. Mutations in this gene have been associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, familial, 10. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 18-31520808-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-31520808-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44299.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr18-31520808-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr18-31520808-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.339 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 27 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DSG2NM_001943.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.222T>C p.His74= synonymous_variant 4/15 ENST00000261590.13
DSG2XM_047437315.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.-313T>C 5_prime_UTR_variant 5/16

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DSG2ENST00000261590.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.222T>C p.His74= synonymous_variant 4/151 NM_001943.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000401
AC:
10
AN:
249108
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000444
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
135180
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000531
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000185
AC:
27
AN:
1461246
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000206
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
726930
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000207
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152314
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000559
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000378
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJan 04, 2010- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 19, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 24, 2019- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 17, 2020- -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthNov 28, 2023- -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 10 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpOct 22, 2023- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 27, 2024This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
6.3
DANN
Benign
0.31
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs367797047; hg19: chr18-29100771; API