18-34104125-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_003787.5(NOL4):c.561G>C(p.Met187Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000013 in 1,611,270 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Uncertain significance in ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003787.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003787.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOL4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.561G>C | p.Met187Ile | missense | Exon 4 of 11 | ENSP00000261592.4 | O94818-1 | ||
| NOL4 | TSL:1 | c.561G>C | p.Met187Ile | missense | Exon 4 of 9 | ENSP00000465450.1 | O94818-2 | ||
| NOL4 | TSL:2 | c.339G>C | p.Met113Ile | missense | Exon 4 of 11 | ENSP00000443472.1 | O94818-3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151976Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000838 AC: 21AN: 250742 AF XY: 0.0000443 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000137 AC: 20AN: 1459294Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000964 AC XY: 7AN XY: 725958 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151976Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74218 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at