18-59431062-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1
The NM_133459.4(CCBE1):c.*4846G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00178 in 152,304 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 1 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
CCBE1
NM_133459.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_133459.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.217
Genes affected
CCBE1 (HGNC:29426): (collagen and calcium binding EGF domains 1) This gene is thought to function in extracellular matrix remodeling and migration. It is predominantly expressed in the ovary, but down regulated in ovarian cancer cell lines and primary carcinomas, suggesting its role as a tumour suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Hennekam lymphangiectasia-lymphedema syndrome, a generalized lymphatic dysplasia in humans. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 18-59431062-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-59431062-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 327585.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00178 (271/152304) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0371 (192/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0328. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 145 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCBE1 | NM_133459.4 | c.*4846G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 11/11 | ENST00000439986.9 | NP_597716.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCBE1 | ENST00000439986 | c.*4846G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 11/11 | 1 | NM_133459.4 | ENSP00000404464.2 | |||
CCBE1 | ENST00000649564 | c.*4846G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 12/12 | ENSP00000497183.1 | |||||
CCBE1 | ENST00000650467.2 | c.*4846G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | ENSP00000496897.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00179 AC: 272AN: 152186Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
272
AN:
152186
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 2Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 2
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
2
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00178 AC: 271AN: 152304Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00195 AC XY: 145AN XY: 74464
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
271
AN:
152304
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
145
AN XY:
74464
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
51
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hennekam lymphangiectasia-lymphedema syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at