18-70004174-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 4P and 3B. PM2PM5BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_173630.4(RTTN):ā€‹c.6658G>Cā€‹(p.Val2220Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000278 in 1,613,394 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā˜…ā˜…). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V2220M) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00030 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RTTN
NM_173630.4 missense

Scores

2
13

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.13
Variant links:
Genes affected
RTTN (HGNC:18654): (rotatin) This gene encodes a large protein whose specific function is unknown. Absence of the orthologous protein in mouse results in embryonic lethality with deficient axial rotation, abnormal differentiation of the neural tube, and randomized looping of the heart tube during development. In human, mutations in this gene are associated with polymicrogyria with seizures. In human fibroblasts this protein localizes at the ciliary basal bodies. Given the intracellular localization of this protein and the phenotypic effects of mutations, this gene is suspected of playing a role in the maintenance of normal ciliary structure which in turn effects the developmental process of left-right organ specification, axial rotation, and perhaps notochord development. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr18-70004174-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.09453559).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000296 (432/1461230) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000375 (417/1111474). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000345. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 217 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 29. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RTTNNM_173630.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6658G>C p.Val2220Leu missense_variant 49/49 ENST00000640769.2 NP_775901.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RTTNENST00000640769.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.6658G>C p.Val2220Leu missense_variant 49/492 NM_173630.4 ENSP00000491507 P1Q86VV8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152046
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000842
AC:
21
AN:
249288
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000961
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
135232
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000646
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000290
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000167
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000141
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000296
AC:
432
AN:
1461230
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.000299
AC XY:
217
AN XY:
726964
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000375
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000994
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152164
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74386
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000336
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000945
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.0000745
AC:
9
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 21, 2022The c.6658G>C (p.V2220L) alteration is located in exon 49 (coding exon 49) of the RTTN gene. This alteration results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 6658, causing the valine (V) at amino acid position 2220 to be replaced by a leucine (L). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpOct 05, 2022This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 2220 of the RTTN protein (p.Val2220Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs201561378, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RTTN-related conditions. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The leucine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.29
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.029
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.14
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.13
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.65
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.70
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.013
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.095
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
Polyphen
0.83
P;.
MutPred
0.32
Gain of disorder (P = 0.0426);.;
ClinPred
0.028
T
GERP RS
4.2
Varity_R
0.053
gMVP
0.13

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.20
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
0.20
Position offset: -6

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201561378; hg19: chr18-67671410; API