19-10173127-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001130823.3(DNMT1):c.731G>A(p.Gly244Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000533 in 1,613,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001130823.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNMT1 | NM_001130823.3 | c.731G>A | p.Gly244Glu | missense_variant | 9/41 | ENST00000359526.9 | NP_001124295.1 | |
DNMT1 | NM_001318730.2 | c.683G>A | p.Gly228Glu | missense_variant | 8/40 | NP_001305659.1 | ||
DNMT1 | NM_001379.4 | c.683G>A | p.Gly228Glu | missense_variant | 8/40 | NP_001370.1 | ||
DNMT1 | NM_001318731.2 | c.368G>A | p.Gly123Glu | missense_variant | 9/41 | NP_001305660.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNMT1 | ENST00000359526.9 | c.731G>A | p.Gly244Glu | missense_variant | 9/41 | 1 | NM_001130823.3 | ENSP00000352516 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000638 AC: 97AN: 152106Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00113 AC: 284AN: 251452Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00101 AC XY: 137AN XY: 135910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000522 AC: 763AN: 1461886Hom.: 5 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000540 AC XY: 393AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000638 AC: 97AN: 152106Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000619 AC XY: 46AN XY: 74300
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary sensory neuropathy-deafness-dementia syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2022 | DNMT1: BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 25, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 27, 2018 | - - |
Hereditary sensory neuropathy-deafness-dementia syndrome;C3807295:Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia, deafness and narcolepsy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Dec 30, 2021 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 30, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at