19-10987736-C-A

Variant names:

• chr19-10987736-C-A
• rs146141457
• NM_001387283.1:c.930C>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_003072.5(SMARCA4):​c.930C>A​(p.Arg310Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00144 in 1,605,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0078 (15 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00078 (18 hom.)
• Consequence: SMARCA4 NM_003072.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.345

Genes affected

SMARCA4 (HGNC:11100): (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the SWI/SNF family of proteins and is similar to the brahma protein of Drosophila. Members of this family have helicase and ATPase activities and are thought to regulate transcription of certain genes by altering the chromatin structure around those genes. The encoded protein is part of the large ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex SNF/SWI, which is required for transcriptional activation of genes normally repressed by chromatin. In addition, this protein can bind BRCA1, as well as regulate the expression of the tumorigenic protein CD44. Mutations in this gene cause rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome type 2. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
• BP6: Variant 19-10987736-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-10987736-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 126367.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-10987736-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0078 (1187/152276) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0274 (1138/41544). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0261. There are 15 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 555 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 1187 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SMARCA4	NM_001387283.1	c.930C>A	p.Arg310Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 36	ENST00000646693.2	NP_001374212.1
SMARCA4	NM_003072.5	c.930C>A	p.Arg310Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 35	ENST00000344626.10	NP_003063.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SMARCA4	ENST00000646693.2	c.930C>A	p.Arg310Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 36		NM_001387283.1	ENSP00000495368.1
SMARCA4	ENST00000344626.10	c.930C>A	p.Arg310Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 35	1	NM_003072.5	ENSP00000343896.4
SMARCA4	ENST00000643549.1	c.930C>A	p.Arg310Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 35			ENSP00000493975.1
SMARCA4	ENST00000541122.6	c.930C>A	p.Arg310Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 35	5		ENSP00000445036.2
SMARCA4	ENST00000643296.1	c.930C>A	p.Arg310Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 34			ENSP00000496635.1
SMARCA4	ENST00000644737.1	c.930C>A	p.Arg310Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 34			ENSP00000495548.1
SMARCA4	ENST00000589677.5	c.930C>A	p.Arg310Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 35	5		ENSP00000464778.1
SMARCA4	ENST00000643995.1	c.342C>A	p.Arg114Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 32			ENSP00000496004.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00779 AC: 1186 AN: 152160 Hom.: 15 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0274

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00216

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000414

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00318

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00478

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00194 AC: 441 AN: 227472 Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00134 AC XY: 168 AN XY: 125116

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0289

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00104

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000338

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000307

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000534

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000780 AC: 1133 AN: 1453382 Hom.: 18 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000670 AC XY: 484 AN XY: 722510

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0281

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00120

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000208

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00185

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00780 AC: 1187 AN: 152276 Hom.: 15 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00745 AC XY: 555 AN XY: 74456

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0274

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00216

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00473

Alfa AF: 0.00222 Hom.: 1

Bravo AF: 0.00832

Asia WGS AF: 0.000866 AC: 3 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3

Jan 13, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Sep 22, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2

Jun 30, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 16 Benign:1

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 2 Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1

May 20, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Coffin-Siris syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.37
CADD	Benign	5.9
DANN	Benign	0.56

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.050		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146141457; hg19: chr19-11098412; COSMIC: COSV104418588; COSMIC: COSV104418588;