Menu
GeneBe

19-1221294-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000455.5(STK11):​c.816C>T​(p.Tyr272=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00467 in 1,611,214 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 280 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.024 ( 128 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0027 ( 152 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.07
Variant links:
Genes affected
STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).
BP6
Variant 19-1221294-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1221294-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 141192.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-1221294-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr19-1221294-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.079 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
STK11NM_000455.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.816C>T p.Tyr272= synonymous_variant 6/10 ENST00000326873.12
STK11NM_001407255.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.816C>T p.Tyr272= synonymous_variant 6/9
STK11NR_176325.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.2083C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 7/11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
STK11ENST00000326873.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.816C>T p.Tyr272= synonymous_variant 6/101 NM_000455.5 P1Q15831-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0239
AC:
3630
AN:
152194
Hom.:
129
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0814
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000412
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0201
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00581
AC:
1422
AN:
244572
Hom.:
52
AF XY:
0.00432
AC XY:
576
AN XY:
133204
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0820
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00401
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000266
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000317
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00269
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00267
AC:
3889
AN:
1458902
Hom.:
152
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00230
AC XY:
1670
AN XY:
725584
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0884
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00467
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000756
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000221
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000275
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00592
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0239
AC:
3638
AN:
152312
Hom.:
128
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0231
AC XY:
1719
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0813
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000412
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0199
Alfa
AF:
0.0141
Hom.:
44
Bravo
AF:
0.0276
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00433
AC:
16
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJul 05, 2018- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 20, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsFeb 20, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioOct 05, 2021- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The STK11 p.Tyr272Tyr variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the MutDB, LOVD 3.0, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, and Insight Hereditary Tumors Database databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs9282859) as “Other”, ClinVar (classified benign by Ambry Genetics and Prevention Genetics, and likely benign by Illumina), and in Cosmic (3X all in lung carcinomas). The variant was also identified in control databases in 2204 (84 homozygous) of 273338 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.008 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017), identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 1993 of 23530 chromosomes (freq: 0.085). The p.Tyr272Tyr variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.95
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs9282859; hg19: chr19-1221293; COSMIC: COSV58823633; COSMIC: COSV58823633; API