19-2248314-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_007165.5(SF3A2):c.1163C>T(p.Pro388Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000114 in 1,403,628 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007165.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_007165.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF3A2 | NM_007165.5 | MANE Select | c.1163C>T | p.Pro388Leu | missense | Exon 9 of 9 | NP_009096.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF3A2 | ENST00000221494.10 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1163C>T | p.Pro388Leu | missense | Exon 9 of 9 | ENSP00000221494.3 | Q15428 | |
| SF3A2 | ENST00000866932.1 | c.1265C>T | p.Pro422Leu | missense | Exon 9 of 9 | ENSP00000536991.1 | |||
| SF3A2 | ENST00000866930.1 | c.1163C>T | p.Pro388Leu | missense | Exon 10 of 10 | ENSP00000536989.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000663 AC: 1AN: 150808Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000120 AC: 15AN: 1252820Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 5AN XY: 606100 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000663 AC: 1AN: 150808Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.0000136 AC XY: 1AN XY: 73620 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at