19-33301691-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_004364.5(CEBPA):​c.724G>A​(p.Gly242Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000826 in 1,166,366 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G242R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00032 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00090 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CEBPA
NM_004364.5 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:1O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.617

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CEBPA (HGNC:1833): (CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha) This intronless gene encodes a transcription factor that contains a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) domain and recognizes the CCAAT motif in the promoters of target genes. The encoded protein functions in homodimers and also heterodimers with CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins beta and gamma. Activity of this protein can modulate the expression of genes involved in cell cycle regulation as well as in body weight homeostasis. Mutation of this gene is associated with acute myeloid leukemia. The use of alternative in-frame non-AUG (GUG) and AUG start codons results in protein isoforms with different lengths. Differential translation initiation is mediated by an out-of-frame, upstream open reading frame which is located between the GUG and the first AUG start codons. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2013]
CEBPA-DT (HGNC:25710): (CEBPA divergent transcript)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.058373034).
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 48 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CEBPANM_004364.5 linkc.724G>A p.Gly242Ser missense_variant Exon 1 of 1 ENST00000498907.3 NP_004355.2
CEBPANM_001287424.2 linkc.829G>A p.Gly277Ser missense_variant Exon 1 of 1 NP_001274353.1
CEBPANM_001287435.2 linkc.682G>A p.Gly228Ser missense_variant Exon 1 of 1 NP_001274364.1
CEBPANM_001285829.2 linkc.367G>A p.Gly123Ser missense_variant Exon 1 of 1 NP_001272758.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CEBPAENST00000498907.3 linkc.724G>A p.Gly242Ser missense_variant Exon 1 of 1 6 NM_004364.5 ENSP00000427514.1
ENSG00000267727ENST00000587312.1 linkn.356+57C>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 1 3
CEBPA-DTENST00000718467.1 linkn.-63C>T upstream_gene_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000323
AC:
48
AN:
148506
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000975
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000668
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000645
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000326
AC:
1
AN:
3068
AF XY:
0.00
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000463
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000899
AC:
915
AN:
1017752
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000881
AC XY:
425
AN XY:
482458
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000982
AC:
2
AN:
20374
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
6042
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10910
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
18584
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000518
AC:
1
AN:
19294
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
17638
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3536
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000977
AC:
862
AN:
882688
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00129
AC:
50
AN:
38686
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
49
99
148
198
247
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
46
92
138
184
230
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000323
AC:
48
AN:
148614
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000276
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
72484
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000972
AC:
4
AN:
41158
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000668
AC:
1
AN:
14980
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3418
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5098
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
9210
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000645
AC:
43
AN:
66670
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2068
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.517
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
7
11
14
18
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000208
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000359
ExAC
AF:
0.000252
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:1Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Acute myeloid leukemia Uncertain:4Other:1
Feb 21, 2023
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The CEBPA c.724G>A (p.Gly242Ser) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.031% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has been reported in an individual diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with a family history of hematological malignancies and solid tumors (PMID: 19731081). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with familial acute myeloid leukemia. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -

Oct 31, 2018
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant classified as Uncertain significance and reported on 06-10-2016 by Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -

Mar 15, 2024
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 12, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 242 of the CEBPA protein (p.Gly242Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs530569305, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with familial hematological malignancies with solid tumors (PMID: 19731081). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 239927). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not provided Uncertain:2
Feb 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 20, 2022
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (El Abed 2009); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19731081) -

not specified Uncertain:1
Jun 19, 2019
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Dec 05, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Autosomal dominant familial acute myeloid leukemia Other:1
-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.50
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.17
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.89
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.86
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.025
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.44
T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.51
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.058
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.0
L
PhyloP100
-0.62
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.92
D
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.60
N
REVEL
Benign
0.087
Sift
Benign
0.54
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.58
T
Polyphen
0.023
B
Vest4
0.18
MVP
0.088
ClinPred
0.032
T
GERP RS
3.2
Varity_R
0.076
gMVP
0.27
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs530569305; hg19: chr19-33792597; COSMIC: COSV57196802; API