19-35849285-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000378910.10(NPHS1):āc.791C>Gā(p.Pro264Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0149 in 1,613,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 229 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P264Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000378910.10 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS1 | NM_004646.4 | c.791C>G | p.Pro264Arg | missense_variant | 7/29 | ENST00000378910.10 | NP_004637.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS1 | ENST00000378910.10 | c.791C>G | p.Pro264Arg | missense_variant | 7/29 | 1 | NM_004646.4 | ENSP00000368190 | P2 | |
NPHS1 | ENST00000353632.6 | c.791C>G | p.Pro264Arg | missense_variant | 7/28 | 5 | ENSP00000343634 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0179 AC: 2726AN: 152134Hom.: 35 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0148 AC: 3682AN: 249158Hom.: 46 AF XY: 0.0147 AC XY: 1990AN XY: 135120
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0146 AC: 21307AN: 1460788Hom.: 195 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0146 AC XY: 10606AN XY: 726704
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0179 AC: 2724AN: 152250Hom.: 34 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0186 AC XY: 1382AN XY: 74428
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2023 | NPHS1: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Feb 06, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 14, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20507940, 24371179, 23595123, 20981092, 18443213, 21228398, 11854170, 27535533, 27884173, 26346198) - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 30, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 20, 2018 | Variant summary: NPHS1 c.791C>G (p.Pro264Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Immunoglobulin-like domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.015 in 275302 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 54 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 4.5 fold above the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NPHS1 causing Nephrotic Syndrome, Type 1 phenotype (0.0034), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.791C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Nephrotic Syndrome, Type 1, without strong evidence for causality. In addition, the variant was found in a patient in cis with a likely pathogenic NPHS1 mutation, which was inherited from a healthy father, further supporting a benign role (Fylaktou_2013). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Finnish congenital nephrotic syndrome Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | - | The heterozygous p.Pro264Arg variant in NPHS1 has been identified in an individual with Finnish type congenital nephrotic syndrome (PMID: 11854170), but has also been identified in >3% of European (Finnish) chromosomes and 20 homozygotes by ExAC (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign for autosomal recessive Finnish type congenital nephrotic syndrome. - |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Mar 09, 2022 | - - |
Congenital nephrotic syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at