19-36086677-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001083961.2(WDR62):c.1643-10C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.107 in 1,594,750 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10,145 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001083961.2 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.136 AC: 20710AN: 152056Hom.: 1724 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.100 AC: 22190AN: 220914Hom.: 1354 AF XY: 0.101 AC XY: 12039AN XY: 118990
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.104 AC: 149311AN: 1442576Hom.: 8421 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.104 AC XY: 74292AN XY: 715818
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.136 AC: 20723AN: 152174Hom.: 1724 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.135 AC XY: 10038AN XY: 74426
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
- -
Microcephaly 2, primary, autosomal recessive, with or without cortical malformations Benign:3
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at