19-38501000-C-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000540.3(RYR1):c.7614+10C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.184 in 1,610,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29,684 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.23 ( 4562 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.18 ( 25122 hom. )
Consequence
RYR1
NM_000540.3 intron
NM_000540.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.348
Genes affected
RYR1 (HGNC:10483): (ryanodine receptor 1) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in skeletal muscle. The encoded protein functions as a calcium release channel in the sarcoplasmic reticulum but also serves to connect the sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubule. Mutations in this gene are associated with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility, central core disease, and minicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia. Alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 19-38501000-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-38501000-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 93289.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-38501000-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.336 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | NM_000540.3 | c.7614+10C>G | intron_variant | ENST00000359596.8 | NP_000531.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | ENST00000359596.8 | c.7614+10C>G | intron_variant | 5 | NM_000540.3 | ENSP00000352608.2 | ||||
RYR1 | ENST00000355481.8 | c.7614+10C>G | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000347667.3 | |||||
RYR1 | ENST00000594335.5 | n.1065+10C>G | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000470927.2 | |||||
RYR1 | ENST00000599547.6 | n.7614+10C>G | intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000471601.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.231 AC: 35106AN: 152002Hom.: 4546 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
35106
AN:
152002
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.214 AC: 51936AN: 242586Hom.: 5988 AF XY: 0.209 AC XY: 27460AN XY: 131646
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
51936
AN:
242586
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
27460
AN XY:
131646
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.179 AC: 261471AN: 1458818Hom.: 25122 Cov.: 39 AF XY: 0.180 AC XY: 130547AN XY: 725520
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
261471
AN:
1458818
Hom.:
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
AC XY:
130547
AN XY:
725520
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.231 AC: 35156AN: 152118Hom.: 4562 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.235 AC XY: 17501AN XY: 74354
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
35156
AN:
152118
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
17501
AN XY:
74354
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
867
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:16Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 03, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 13, 2015 | c.7614+10C>G in intron 47 of RYR1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus se quence. It has been identified in 33.2% (1463/4406) of African American chromoso mes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs .washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2960323). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 06, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 22, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (RYR1) | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | Allele frequency is common in at least one population database (frequency: 36.177% in ExAC) based on the frequency threshold of 2.223% for this gene. Variant was observed in a homozygous state in population databases more than expected for disease. 9 reputable source/s reports the variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation. - |
Congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Central core myopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
RYR1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Neuromuscular disease, congenital, with uniform type 1 fiber Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
King Denborough syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at