19-41756789-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_002483.7(CEACAM6):c.254G>A(p.Gly85Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0047 in 1,613,966 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 276 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002483.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEACAM6 | NM_002483.7 | c.254G>A | p.Gly85Glu | missense_variant | 2/6 | ENST00000199764.7 | |
LOC112268252 | XR_002958447.2 | n.1628C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | |||
CEACAM6 | XM_011526990.3 | c.254G>A | p.Gly85Glu | missense_variant | 2/5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEACAM6 | ENST00000199764.7 | c.254G>A | p.Gly85Glu | missense_variant | 2/6 | 1 | NM_002483.7 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0238 AC: 3612AN: 151962Hom.: 160 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00701 AC: 1764AN: 251474Hom.: 76 AF XY: 0.00512 AC XY: 696AN XY: 135910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00270 AC: 3942AN: 1461886Hom.: 113 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00236 AC XY: 1714AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0239 AC: 3638AN: 152080Hom.: 163 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0227 AC XY: 1687AN XY: 74364
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 28, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at