19-7293887-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000208.4(INSR):āc.5C>Gā(p.Ala2Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1 in 151,276 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 75,632 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000208.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSR | NM_000208.4 | c.5C>G | p.Ala2Gly | missense_variant | 1/22 | ENST00000302850.10 | |
INSR | NM_001079817.3 | c.5C>G | p.Ala2Gly | missense_variant | 1/21 | ||
INSR | XM_011527988.3 | c.5C>G | p.Ala2Gly | missense_variant | 1/22 | ||
INSR | XM_011527989.4 | c.5C>G | p.Ala2Gly | missense_variant | 1/21 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSR | ENST00000302850.10 | c.5C>G | p.Ala2Gly | missense_variant | 1/22 | 1 | NM_000208.4 | A2 | |
INSR | ENST00000341500.9 | c.5C>G | p.Ala2Gly | missense_variant | 1/21 | 1 | P3 | ||
INSR | ENST00000598216.1 | upstream_gene_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 1.00 AC: 151160AN: 151166Hom.: 75577 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 1.00 AC: 332AN: 332Hom.: 166 AF XY: 1.00 AC XY: 208AN XY: 208
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 1.00 AC: 1076634AN: 1076648Hom.: 538310 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 1.00 AC XY: 515857AN XY: 515860
GnomAD4 genome AF: 1.00 AC: 151270AN: 151276Hom.: 75632 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 1.00 AC XY: 73953AN XY: 73958
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 23, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 09, 2018 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 24, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 09, 2021 | - - |
Insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus AND acanthosis nigricans Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 19, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Leprechaunism syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 19, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at