Menu
GeneBe

rs7508518

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000208.4(INSR):ā€‹c.5C>Gā€‹(p.Ala2Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1 in 151,276 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 75,632 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 1.0 ( 75632 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 1.0 ( 538310 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

INSR
NM_000208.4 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.458
Variant links:
Genes affected
INSR (HGNC:6091): (insulin receptor) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that form a heterotetrameric receptor. Binding of insulin or other ligands to this receptor activates the insulin signaling pathway, which regulates glucose uptake and release, as well as the synthesis and storage of carbohydrates, lipids and protein. Mutations in this gene underlie the inherited severe insulin resistance syndromes including type A insulin resistance syndrome, Donohue syndrome and Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, INSR
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=1.1230504E-6).
BP6
Variant 19-7293887-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-7293887-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 193063.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.994 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
INSRNM_000208.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5C>G p.Ala2Gly missense_variant 1/22 ENST00000302850.10
INSRNM_001079817.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.5C>G p.Ala2Gly missense_variant 1/21
INSRXM_011527988.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.5C>G p.Ala2Gly missense_variant 1/22
INSRXM_011527989.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5C>G p.Ala2Gly missense_variant 1/21

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
INSRENST00000302850.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.5C>G p.Ala2Gly missense_variant 1/221 NM_000208.4 A2P06213-1
INSRENST00000341500.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.5C>G p.Ala2Gly missense_variant 1/211 P3P06213-2
INSRENST00000598216.1 linkuse as main transcript upstream_gene_variant 1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
1.00
AC:
151160
AN:
151166
Hom.:
75577
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
1.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
1.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
1.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
1.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.999
Gnomad SAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
1.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
1.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
1.00
AC:
332
AN:
332
Hom.:
166
AF XY:
1.00
AC XY:
208
AN XY:
208
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
1.00
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
1.00
AC:
1076634
AN:
1076648
Hom.:
538310
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
1.00
AC XY:
515857
AN XY:
515860
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
1.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
1.00
AC:
151270
AN:
151276
Hom.:
75632
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
1.00
AC XY:
73953
AN XY:
73958
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.999
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
1.00
Alfa
AF:
1.00
Hom.:
9259
Bravo
AF:
1.00
TwinsUK
AF:
1.00
AC:
3708
ALSPAC
AF:
1.00
AC:
3854
ExAC
AF:
1.00
AC:
1674
Asia WGS
AF:
1.00
AC:
3240
AN:
3240

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJul 23, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 09, 2018- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMar 24, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 09, 2021- -
Insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus AND acanthosis nigricans Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabAug 19, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Leprechaunism syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabAug 19, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.067
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.16
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.46
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0064
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.20
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000011
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.4
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.85
D
PROVEAN
Benign
0.47
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.53
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B
Vest4
0.045
MPC
0.76
ClinPred
0.0043
T
GERP RS
2.6
Varity_R
0.029
gMVP
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7508518; hg19: chr19-7293898; COSMIC: COSV105137469; COSMIC: COSV105137469; API