2-149576462-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_015702.3(MMADHC):c.453G>A(p.Gln151Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.887 in 1,611,946 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 639,717 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.79 ( 50343 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.90 ( 589374 hom. )
Consequence
MMADHC
NM_015702.3 synonymous
NM_015702.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0920
Genes affected
MMADHC (HGNC:25221): (metabolism of cobalamin associated D) This gene encodes a mitochondrial protein that is involved in an early step of vitamin B12 metabolism. Vitamin B12 (cobalamin) is essential for normal development and survival in humans. Mutations in this gene cause methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria type cblD (MMADHC), a disorder of cobalamin metabolism that is characterized by decreased levels of the coenzymes adenosylcobalamin and methylcobalamin. Pseudogenes have been identified on chromosomes 11 and X.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.33).
BP6
Variant 2-149576462-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-149576462-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 203836.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-149576462-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.092 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.907 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMADHC | NM_015702.3 | c.453G>A | p.Gln151Gln | synonymous_variant | 5/8 | ENST00000303319.10 | NP_056517.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMADHC | ENST00000303319.10 | c.453G>A | p.Gln151Gln | synonymous_variant | 5/8 | 1 | NM_015702.3 | ENSP00000301920.5 | ||
MMADHC | ENST00000422782.2 | c.453G>A | p.Gln151Gln | synonymous_variant | 5/9 | 5 | ENSP00000408331.2 | |||
MMADHC | ENST00000428879.5 | c.453G>A | p.Gln151Gln | synonymous_variant | 4/7 | 2 | ENSP00000389060.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.795 AC: 120877AN: 152000Hom.: 50330 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
120877
AN:
152000
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.873 AC: 219524AN: 251342Hom.: 97163 AF XY: 0.882 AC XY: 119857AN XY: 135844
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
219524
AN:
251342
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
119857
AN XY:
135844
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.896 AC: 1308164AN: 1459828Hom.: 589374 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.898 AC XY: 652192AN XY: 726390
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1308164
AN:
1459828
Hom.:
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
AC XY:
652192
AN XY:
726390
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.795 AC: 120929AN: 152118Hom.: 50343 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.799 AC XY: 59388AN XY: 74370
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
120929
AN:
152118
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
59388
AN XY:
74370
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3020
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria type cblD Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 29, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: 87% of total chromosomes in ExAC - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 07, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Disorders of Intracellular Cobalamin Metabolism Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at