2-166306533-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):​c.444A>G​(p.Pro148=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.655 in 1,569,836 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 340,100 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.69 ( 37218 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.65 ( 302882 hom. )

Consequence

SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.331
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 2-166306533-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166306533-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130269.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-166306533-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-166306533-T-C is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.331 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.83 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SCN9ANM_001365536.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.444A>G p.Pro148= synonymous_variant 4/27 ENST00000642356.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SCN9AENST00000642356.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.444A>G p.Pro148= synonymous_variant 4/27 NM_001365536.1 P1Q15858-1
SCN1A-AS1ENST00000651574.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1977+10404T>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.692
AC:
105033
AN:
151848
Hom.:
37173
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.837
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.773
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.658
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.541
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.439
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.583
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.606
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.551
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.658
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.686
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.628
AC:
126287
AN:
201130
Hom.:
40351
AF XY:
0.622
AC XY:
66668
AN XY:
107152
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.837
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.643
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.549
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.432
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.589
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.600
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.654
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.625
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.651
AC:
923173
AN:
1417870
Hom.:
302882
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.649
AC XY:
455551
AN XY:
702288
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.840
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.642
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.549
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.467
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.590
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.606
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.662
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.646
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.692
AC:
105128
AN:
151966
Hom.:
37218
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.685
AC XY:
50872
AN XY:
74256
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.837
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.657
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.541
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.440
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.582
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.606
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.658
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.680
Alfa
AF:
0.658
Hom.:
64654
Bravo
AF:
0.699
Asia WGS
AF:
0.534
AC:
1859
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingUnidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría GarrahanJul 15, 2024This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 84% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 78. Only high quality variants are reported. -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 06, 2018- -
Primary erythromelalgia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 7;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Small fiber neuropathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
3.2
DANN
Benign
0.46
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs9646771; hg19: chr2-167163043; COSMIC: COSV57602317; COSMIC: COSV57602317; API