2-178740901-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP2BP4_Strong
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):āc.12332C>Gā(p.Ala4111Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000502 in 1,613,892 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.12332C>G | p.Ala4111Gly | missense_variant | 48/363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.12332C>G | p.Ala4111Gly | missense_variant | 48/363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000230 AC: 35AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000765 AC: 19AN: 248274Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000743 AC XY: 10AN XY: 134656
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000315 AC: 46AN: 1461588Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 17AN XY: 727086
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000230 AC: 35AN: 152304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000295 AC XY: 22AN XY: 74474
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 24, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 15, 2017 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 09, 2024 | Variant summary: TTN c.10361-2541C>G is located at a position not widely known to affect splicing in NM_133378.4. Consensus agreement among computation tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant has also been annotated as NM_001267550:c.12332C>G (p.A4111G) in exon 49 of the Meta transcript and that exon is considered to be constitutively expressed (PSI is 100% in DCM and 95% in GTEx) in the I-band region. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.7e-05 in 248274 control chromosomes. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.10361-2541C>G in individuals affected with Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy, Type 2J and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 385539). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS. - |
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 27, 2017 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 14, 2018 | The p.A3748G variant (also known as c.11243C>G), located in coding exon 44 of the TTN gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 11243. The alanine at codon 3748 is replaced by glycine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at