2-214730497-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PP3_ModerateBS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):​c.1915T>C​(p.Cys639Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000434 in 1,613,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C639Y) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000045 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 missense

Scores

11
7

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.68

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
BARD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.898
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 66 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BARD1NM_000465.4 linkc.1915T>C p.Cys639Arg missense_variant Exon 10 of 11 ENST00000260947.9 NP_000456.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BARD1ENST00000260947.9 linkc.1915T>C p.Cys639Arg missense_variant Exon 10 of 11 1 NM_000465.4 ENSP00000260947.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000279
AC:
7
AN:
251322
AF XY:
0.0000294
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000925
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000440
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000452
AC:
66
AN:
1461640
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000454
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
727114
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000299
AC:
1
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39658
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000375
AC:
2
AN:
53384
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000558
AC:
62
AN:
1111888
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000166
AC:
1
AN:
60378
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
11
15
19
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000404
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74342
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41440
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000189
AC:
2
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2094
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Alfa
AF:
0.0000490
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000227
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:5
Jul 02, 2018
Mendelics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 21, 2023
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 31, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 639 of the BARD1 protein (p.Cys639Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs587781376, gnomAD 0.009%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 26534844, 30613976, 31036035, 31159747, 31512090, 35264596, 36980780). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 140927). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Jun 06, 2022
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3
Aug 01, 2018
GeneKor MSA
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 01, 2023
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This missense variant replaces cysteine with arginine at codon 639 of the BARD1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 26534844, 31036035, 31159747, 31512090, 36980780). In a large breast cancer case-control study conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 6/60466 cases and 4/53461 unaffected controls (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BARD1_000127). This variant has been identified in 7/251322 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Jul 16, 2025
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.C639R variant (also known as c.1915T>C), located in coding exon 10 of the BARD1 gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 1915. The cysteine at codon 639 is replaced by arginine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This variant has been identified in numerous disease cohorts as well as unaffected control groups across studies (Li J et al. J. Med. Genet., 2016 Jan;53:34-42; Scarpitta R et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2019 Dec;178:557-564; Tsaousis GN et al. BMC Cancer, 2019 Jun;19:535; Weber-Lassalle N et al. Breast Cancer Res, 2019 04;21:55; Dorling et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 02;384:428-439; Rizzolo P et al. Int J Cancer, 2019 Jul;145:390-400; Guindalini RSC et al. Sci Rep, 2022 Mar;12:4190). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.

not specified Uncertain:2
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 05, 2025
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BARD1 c.1915T>C (p.Cys639Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.8e-05 in 251322 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1915T>C has been observed in individuals affected with Breast Cancer, as well as unaffected controls (e.g., Li_2016, Weber-Lassalle_2019, Dorling_2021, Guinalini_2022). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 26534844, 35264596, 33471991, 31036035). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 140927). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.

not provided Uncertain:2
Feb 07, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Observed in individuals with a personal or family history including breast and/ovarian cancer (PMID: 26534844, 31036035, 31512090, 30613976, 35264596, 36980780, 33471991); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31036035, 31512090, 26534844, 31159747, 17550235, 33471991, 30613976, 35264596, 36980780)

Jan 10, 2020
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BARD1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Mar 13, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BARD1 c.1915T>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Cys639Arg. This variant has been reported in multiple individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (see for example, Table 1, Li et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 26534844; Table S3, Rizzolo et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 30613976; Table S3, Guindalini et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 35264596). However, this variant has also been seen in presumably healthy controls (Supplementary File, Breast Cancer Association Consortium. 2021. PubMed ID: 33471991). This variant is reported in 0.0092% of alleles in individuals of European (Finnish) descent in gnomAD. This variant has been classified as uncertain significance by other institutions in the ClinVar database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/140927/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.93
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.27
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.28
CADD
Pathogenic
27
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.68
D;.;.;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.88
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.83
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;T;D;D;D;.;.
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.20
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.90
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.11
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.3
M;.;.;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
7.7
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.66
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-8.7
D;.;.;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.71
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;.;.;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0010
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Vest4
0.82
ClinPred
0.98
D
GERP RS
5.8
PromoterAI
0.046
Neutral
Varity_R
0.98
gMVP
0.95
Mutation Taster
=40/60
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587781376; hg19: chr2-215595221; API