2-240868891-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000030.3(AGXT):c.26C>A(p.Thr9Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00888 in 1,611,766 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 80 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T9T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000030.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGXT | NM_000030.3 | c.26C>A | p.Thr9Asn | missense_variant | 1/11 | ENST00000307503.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGXT | ENST00000307503.4 | c.26C>A | p.Thr9Asn | missense_variant | 1/11 | 1 | NM_000030.3 | P1 | |
AGXT | ENST00000472436.1 | n.46C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/5 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00711 AC: 1080AN: 151974Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00919 AC: 2204AN: 239930Hom.: 18 AF XY: 0.00945 AC XY: 1233AN XY: 130504
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00906 AC: 13227AN: 1459678Hom.: 74 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00908 AC XY: 6596AN XY: 726058
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00709 AC: 1079AN: 152088Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00678 AC XY: 504AN XY: 74354
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary hyperoxaluria, type I Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Feb 13, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | in vitro | Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Health Services Laboratory | Nov 27, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | AGXT: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 04, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28969594, 27884173, 15849466, 21228398, 20981092, 17495019) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 17, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 18, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC frequency - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at