2-26481015-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BA1BP4

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency (the lower threshold of the 95% CI of 232/24628) of the c.1580-6C>T variant in the OTOF gene is 0.843% for African/African-American chromosomes by gnomAD, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal recessive hearing loss variants (BA1). Additionally, splice prediction analysis using MaxEntScan and SpliceAI does not suggest an impact to splicing (BP4). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the Hearing Loss Expert Panel: BA1, BP4. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA177561/MONDO:0019497/005

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00028 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

OTOF
NM_194248.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.00007058

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.441

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OTOF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

OTOF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

BA1

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOF	NM_194248.3 link	c.1580-6C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 46	ENST00000272371.7	NP_919224.1	Q9HC10-1
OTOF	NM_001287489.2 link	c.1580-6C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 45		NP_001274418.1	Q9HC10-5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OTOF	ENST00000272371.7 link	c.1580-6C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 46	1	NM_194248.3	ENSP00000272371.2		Q9HC10-1
OTOF	ENST00000403946.7 link	c.1580-6C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 45	5		ENSP00000385255.3		Q9HC10-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00287

AC:

437

AN:

152204

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00972

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00157

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000758

AC:

187

AN:

246818

AF XY:

0.000589

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00948

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000959

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000907

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000283

AC:

412

AN:

1457396

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000250

AC XY:

181

AN XY:

725122

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00934

AC:

312

AN:

33420

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000895

AC:

AN:

44678

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26112

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39662

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000812

AC:

AN:

86166

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52190

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5762

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000270

AC:

AN:

1109134

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000830

AC:

AN:

60272

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

116

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00287

AC:

437

AN:

152322

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00286

AC XY:

213

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00972

AC:

404

AN:

41578

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00157

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000735

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00189

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

117

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00137

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00298

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000594

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Dec 31, 2019

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 14, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

1580-6C>T in Intron 14 of OTOF: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 0.7% (25/3738) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs114260271). -

Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss

Benign:1

May 13, 2022

ClinGen Hearing Loss Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance:Benign

Review Status:reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method:curation

The filtering allele frequency (the lower threshold of the 95% CI of 232/24628) of the c.1580-6C>T variant in the OTOF gene is 0.843% for African/African-American chromosomes by gnomAD, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal recessive hearing loss variants (BA1). Additionally, splice prediction analysis using MaxEntScan and SpliceAI does not suggest an impact to splicing (BP4). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the Hearing Loss Expert Panel: BA1, BP4. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.80

CADD

Benign

5.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.59

PhyloP100

0.44

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.000071

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over