rs114260271
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BA1BP4
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency (the lower threshold of the 95% CI of 232/24628) of the c.1580-6C>T variant in the OTOF gene is 0.843% for African/African-American chromosomes by gnomAD, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal recessive hearing loss variants (BA1). Additionally, splice prediction analysis using MaxEntScan and SpliceAI does not suggest an impact to splicing (BP4). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the Hearing Loss Expert Panel: BA1, BP4. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA177561/MONDO:0019497/005
Frequency
Consequence
NM_194248.3 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9Inheritance: AR, Unknown Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_194248.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00287 AC: 437AN: 152204Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000758 AC: 187AN: 246818 AF XY: 0.000589 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000283 AC: 412AN: 1457396Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000250 AC XY: 181AN XY: 725122 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00287 AC: 437AN: 152322Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00286 AC XY: 213AN XY: 74478 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at