2-47403411-C-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000233146.7(MSH2):c.211+9C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.432 in 1,587,578 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 157,528 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.53 ( 23530 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.42 ( 133998 hom. )
Consequence
MSH2
ENST00000233146.7 intron
ENST00000233146.7 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.39
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 2-47403411-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47403411-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 36573.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47403411-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-47403411-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.781 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.211+9C>G | intron_variant | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.211+9C>G | intron_variant | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.530 AC: 80592AN: 151992Hom.: 23493 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
80592
AN:
151992
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.473 AC: 101041AN: 213394Hom.: 25877 AF XY: 0.462 AC XY: 54163AN XY: 117226
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
101041
AN:
213394
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
54163
AN XY:
117226
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.421 AC: 604488AN: 1435464Hom.: 133998 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.420 AC XY: 298308AN XY: 710378
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
604488
AN:
1435464
Hom.:
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
AC XY:
298308
AN XY:
710378
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.530 AC: 80679AN: 152114Hom.: 23530 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.538 AC XY: 39972AN XY: 74350
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
80679
AN:
152114
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
39972
AN XY:
74350
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2216
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:22
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Dec 03, 2012 | 211+9C>G in intron 1 of MSH2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it is not located within the conserved +/- 1, 2 invariant regio n. It has been identified in 36% (3011/8418) of European American chromosomes fr om a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washi ngton.edu/EVS/; rs23033426). 211+9C>G in intron 1 of MSH2 (rs23033426; allele f requency= 36%, 3011/8418) ** - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 27, 2015 | - - |
Lynch syndrome 1 Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Pathway Genomics | Jul 24, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30093976) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 30, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 19, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 01, 2014 | - - |
Lynch syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing;curation | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 18, 2011 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | research | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Sep 05, 2013 | MAF >1% - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The c.211+9C>G variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located in the conserved region of the splicing consensus sequence. Furthermore, this variant is reported as a common polymorphism in dbSNP (rs2303426) and reported as a benign polymorphism in the literature. Average Heterozygosity: 0.488+/-0.075 - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at