2-47470983-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000251.3(MSH2):​c.1680T>C​(p.Asn560Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000359 in 1,540,646 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00041 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MSH2
NM_000251.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.581

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
MSH2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Lynch syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Lynch syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • Muir-Torre syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, G2P
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • malignant pancreatic neoplasm
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • rhabdomyosarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 2-47470983-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47470983-T-C is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 90744.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.581 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MSH2NM_000251.3 linkc.1680T>C p.Asn560Asn synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 16 ENST00000233146.7 NP_000242.1 P43246-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MSH2ENST00000233146.7 linkc.1680T>C p.Asn560Asn synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 16 1 NM_000251.3 ENSP00000233146.2 P43246-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000407
AC:
62
AN:
152170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000617
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000284
AC:
71
AN:
250078
AF XY:
0.000303
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000622
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000581
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000557
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000354
AC:
491
AN:
1388476
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.000327
AC XY:
227
AN XY:
695002
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000312
AC:
1
AN:
32082
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000673
AC:
3
AN:
44552
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25682
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39258
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
84348
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000244
AC:
13
AN:
53330
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5388
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000439
AC:
459
AN:
1046054
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000260
AC:
15
AN:
57782
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
21
42
62
83
104
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000407
AC:
62
AN:
152170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000363
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
74338
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000483
AC:
2
AN:
41432
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5204
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000942
AC:
1
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000617
AC:
42
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2090
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
10
13
16
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000443
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000412
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:21
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 27, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The MSH2 c.1680T>C (p.Asn560Asn) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splicing algorithms predict no change to normal splicing, and ex vivo splicing assay showed this variant does not affect splicing. This variant was found in 42/120644 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0006173 (41/66422). This frequency is greater than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic MSH2 variant (0.0005683), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Non-Finnish) origin. In addition, the variant was found to co-occur with a pathogenic MSH2 variant, c.1079T>A (p.Leu360X), in one individual reported by UMD. Furthermore, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MSH2: BP4, BP7 -

not specified Benign:4
Oct 08, 2019
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 18, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Dec 03, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Jun 08, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Jul 07, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jul 22, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 15, 2024
Hereditary Cancer Laboratory, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PM2+BP4+BP6+BP7 -

Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Dec 10, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Lynch syndrome Benign:2
Sep 05, 2013
International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:research

Synonymous substitution with no effec on splicing, tested with NMD inhibitor -

Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
May 05, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Jan 28, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The MSH2 p.Asn560= variant was identified in the literature however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided (Tournier 2008). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs200056411) as With Likely benign allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx, Invitae; as likely benign by Insight, Ambry Genetics), Clinvitae (classified as benign by ClinVar; as likely benign by Invitae), UMD-LSDB (6X as neutral), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (8X Class2), and the Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (8X Class2). The variant was not identified in COGR, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, and Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database. In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic MSH2 variant (c.1079T>A (p.Leu360X)), increasing the likelihood that the p.Asn560= variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was identified in control databases in 81 of 276170 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003 in the following populations: EuropeanNon-Finnish in 71 of 126188 chromosomes (freq. 0.001), EuropeanFinnish in 6 of 25786 chromosomes (freq. 0.0002), Latino in 2 of 34356 chromosomes (freq.0.0001), African in 1 of 24008 chromosomes (freq. 0.00004), Other in 1 of 6452 chromosomes (freq. 0.0002), increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). Functional analysis using the pCAS ex vivo splicing assay demonstrated this variant had no effect (Tournier 2008). The p.Asn560= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Muir-Torré syndrome;C2936783:Lynch syndrome 1;C5436806:Mismatch repair cancer syndrome 2 Benign:1
Mar 16, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
4.3
DANN
Benign
0.55
PhyloP100
0.58
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicevardb
1.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200056411; hg19: chr2-47698122; API