Menu
GeneBe

2-47798625-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000179.3(MSH6):c.642C>T(p.Tyr214=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0912 in 1,610,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7,851 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.072 ( 550 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.093 ( 7301 hom. )

Consequence

MSH6
NM_000179.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:23

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.00
Variant links:
Genes affected
MSH6 (HGNC:7329): (mutS homolog 6) This gene encodes a member of the DNA mismatch repair MutS family. In E. coli, the MutS protein helps in the recognition of mismatched nucleotides prior to their repair. A highly conserved region of approximately 150 aa, called the Walker-A adenine nucleotide binding motif, exists in MutS homologs. The encoded protein heterodimerizes with MSH2 to form a mismatch recognition complex that functions as a bidirectional molecular switch that exchanges ADP and ATP as DNA mismatches are bound and dissociated. Mutations in this gene may be associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, colorectal cancer, and endometrial cancer. Transcripts variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
FBXO11 (HGNC:13590): (F-box protein 11) This gene encodes a member of the F-box protein family which is characterized by an approximately 40 amino acid motif, the F-box. The F-box proteins constitute one of the four subunits of ubiquitin protein ligase complex called SCFs (SKP1-cullin-F-box), which function in phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination. The F-box proteins are divided into 3 classes: Fbws containing WD-40 domains, Fbls containing leucine-rich repeats, and Fbxs containing either different protein-protein interaction modules or no recognizable motifs. The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the Fbxs class. It can function as an arginine methyltransferase that symmetrically dimethylates arginine residues, and it acts as an adaptor protein to mediate the neddylation of p53, which leads to the suppression of p53 function. This gene is known to be down-regulated in melanocytes from patients with vitiligo, a skin disorder that results in depigmentation. Polymorphisms in this gene are associated with chronic otitis media with effusion and recurrent otitis media (COME/ROM), a hearing loss disorder, and the knockout of the homologous mouse gene results in the deaf mouse mutant Jeff (Jf), a single gene model of otitis media. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 2-47798625-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47798625-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 36599.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47798625-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.106 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MSH6NM_000179.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.642C>T p.Tyr214= synonymous_variant 4/10 ENST00000234420.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MSH6ENST00000234420.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.642C>T p.Tyr214= synonymous_variant 4/101 NM_000179.3 P4P52701-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0719
AC:
10921
AN:
151930
Hom.:
550
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0199
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0451
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0485
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0363
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000770
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0135
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.156
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.108
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0727
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0711
AC:
17523
AN:
246622
Hom.:
955
AF XY:
0.0710
AC XY:
9483
AN XY:
133640
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0336
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0376
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000547
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.149
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.107
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0670
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0932
AC:
135926
AN:
1458156
Hom.:
7301
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0909
AC XY:
65945
AN XY:
725442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0350
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0390
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0179
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.145
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.107
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0778
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0718
AC:
10923
AN:
152048
Hom.:
550
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0713
AC XY:
5296
AN XY:
74304
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0198
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0485
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0363
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000772
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.156
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.108
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0714
Alfa
AF:
0.0921
Hom.:
428
Bravo
AF:
0.0614
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00924
AC:
32
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0940
EpiControl
AF:
0.0920

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:23
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineSep 21, 2011- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 22, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Lynch syndrome 5 Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 24, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJan 02, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsFeb 27, 2018- -
Lynch syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 18, 2011- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelresearchInternational Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)Sep 05, 2013MAF >1% -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27884173, 12547705, 24689082, 23588873) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Endometrial carcinoma;C1833477:Lynch syndrome 5;C5436807:Mismatch repair cancer syndrome 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsDec 13, 2021- -
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Tyr214Tyr variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located near a splice junction. It is listed in dbSNP database as coming from a "clinical source" (ID#: rs1800937) with a global minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.050, being identified in varying frequencies in various ethnic groups from the HapMap project. It has been reported in the literature in 69/1520 proband chromosomes of individuals from HNPCC and HNPCC-like families, as well as in breast cancer families with colorectal and/ or endometrial cancer. It was also reported in 22/1336 control chromosomes evaluated (Charames_2000_11153917, de Abajo_2005_16270383, Dovrat_2005_16341805, Hendriks_2003_12547705, Kolodner_1999_10537275, Perez-Cabornero_2009_19250818, Peterlongo_2003_14520694, Plaschke_2000_10699937, Vahteristo_2005_15805151, Verma_1999_10507723). In addition, the variant was also identified in the UMD database (x66) as a neutral alteration, as well as in the InSiGHT and Exome Server databases. In summary, based on the above information, this variant is classified as Benign. -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
Cadd
Benign
0.23
Dann
Benign
0.92
RBP_binding_hub_radar
1.1
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.2

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800937; hg19: chr2-48025764; COSMIC: COSV52279626; COSMIC: COSV52279626; API