2-47799147-C-T

Variant names:

• chr2-47799147-C-T
• rs55708305
• NM_000179.3:c.1164C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_000179.3(MSH6):​c.1164C>T​(p.His388His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00248 in 1,613,754 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 80 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 (36 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 (44 hom.)
• Consequence: MSH6 NM_000179.3 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign reviewed by expert panel B:20
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.424

Genes affected

MSH6 (HGNC:7329): (mutS homolog 6) This gene encodes a member of the DNA mismatch repair MutS family. In E. coli, the MutS protein helps in the recognition of mismatched nucleotides prior to their repair. A highly conserved region of approximately 150 aa, called the Walker-A adenine nucleotide binding motif, exists in MutS homologs. The encoded protein heterodimerizes with MSH2 to form a mismatch recognition complex that functions as a bidirectional molecular switch that exchanges ADP and ATP as DNA mismatches are bound and dissociated. Mutations in this gene may be associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, colorectal cancer, and endometrial cancer. Transcripts variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]

FBXO11 (HGNC:13590): (F-box protein 11) This gene encodes a member of the F-box protein family which is characterized by an approximately 40 amino acid motif, the F-box. The F-box proteins constitute one of the four subunits of ubiquitin protein ligase complex called SCFs (SKP1-cullin-F-box), which function in phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination. The F-box proteins are divided into 3 classes: Fbws containing WD-40 domains, Fbls containing leucine-rich repeats, and Fbxs containing either different protein-protein interaction modules or no recognizable motifs. The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the Fbxs class. It can function as an arginine methyltransferase that symmetrically dimethylates arginine residues, and it acts as an adaptor protein to mediate the neddylation of p53, which leads to the suppression of p53 function. This gene is known to be down-regulated in melanocytes from patients with vitiligo, a skin disorder that results in depigmentation. Polymorphisms in this gene are associated with chronic otitis media with effusion and recurrent otitis media (COME/ROM), a hearing loss disorder, and the knockout of the homologous mouse gene results in the deaf mouse mutant Jeff (Jf), a single gene model of otitis media. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
• BP6: Variant 2-47799147-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47799147-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 42467.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47799147-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.424 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0129 (1964/151874) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0428 (1771/41380). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0411. There are 36 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 959 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 36 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MSH6	NM_000179.3	c.1164C>T	p.His388His	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 10	ENST00000234420.11	NP_000170.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MSH6	ENST00000234420.11	c.1164C>T	p.His388His	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 10	1	NM_000179.3	ENSP00000234420.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0129 AC: 1958 AN: 151756 Hom.: 36 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0428

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00952

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000209

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00318

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000191

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0159

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00351 AC: 881 AN: 250986 Hom.: 21 AF XY: 0.00260 AC XY: 352 AN XY: 135622

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0436

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00364

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000282

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00245

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00139 AC: 2034 AN: 1461880 Hom.: 44 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00125 AC XY: 906 AN XY: 727236

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0447

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00418

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000464

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000122

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00321

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0129 AC: 1964 AN: 151874 Hom.: 36 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0129 AC XY: 959 AN XY: 74276

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0428

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00951

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000209

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000191

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0157

Alfa AF: 0.00582 Hom.: 10

Bravo AF: 0.0152

Asia WGS AF: 0.00173 AC: 6 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000327

EpiControl AF: 0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:20

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8

Apr 11, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 10, 2008

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4

Nov 18, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 30, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Feb 20, 2018

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3

Oct 02, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Lynch syndrome 5 Benign:2

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Lynch syndrome Benign:1

Sep 05, 2013

International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: research

MAF >1% & Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability <0.001 -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Endometrial carcinoma Benign:1

-

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The MSH6 p.His388= variant was identified in 4 of 908 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from cases with high risk breast and colon cancer and was not identified in 332 chromosomes from healthy individuals (Kolodner 1999, Perez-Cabornero 2009, Sanchez 2005, Wasielewski 2009). The variant was identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs55708305) “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified benign, reviewed by an expert panel 2013, submitters: benign by InSIGHT, Invitae, Ambry Genetics, EGL Genetic Diagnostics, Prevention Genetics and Mayo Clinic, and likely benign by Illumina and the Laboratory for Molecular Medicine), Clinvitae (4x), UMD-LSDB (8x neutral), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (4x), Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database (3x), Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (4x) and was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 1240 (29 homozygous) of 276736 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.004 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Observations by population include African in 1060 of 24012 chromosomes (freq: 0.04), Other in 18 of 6454 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Latino in 125 of 34402 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), European Non-Finnish in 37 of 126300 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.His388= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.42
CADD	Benign	6.9
DANN	Benign	0.84
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.8

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55708305; hg19: chr2-48026286; COSMIC: COSV104579421; COSMIC: COSV104579421;