2-47799147-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000179.3(MSH6):c.1164C>T(p.His388His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00248 in 1,613,754 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 80 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 36 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 44 hom. )
Consequence
MSH6
NM_000179.3 synonymous
NM_000179.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.424
Genes affected
MSH6 (HGNC:7329): (mutS homolog 6) This gene encodes a member of the DNA mismatch repair MutS family. In E. coli, the MutS protein helps in the recognition of mismatched nucleotides prior to their repair. A highly conserved region of approximately 150 aa, called the Walker-A adenine nucleotide binding motif, exists in MutS homologs. The encoded protein heterodimerizes with MSH2 to form a mismatch recognition complex that functions as a bidirectional molecular switch that exchanges ADP and ATP as DNA mismatches are bound and dissociated. Mutations in this gene may be associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, colorectal cancer, and endometrial cancer. Transcripts variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
FBXO11 (HGNC:13590): (F-box protein 11) This gene encodes a member of the F-box protein family which is characterized by an approximately 40 amino acid motif, the F-box. The F-box proteins constitute one of the four subunits of ubiquitin protein ligase complex called SCFs (SKP1-cullin-F-box), which function in phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination. The F-box proteins are divided into 3 classes: Fbws containing WD-40 domains, Fbls containing leucine-rich repeats, and Fbxs containing either different protein-protein interaction modules or no recognizable motifs. The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the Fbxs class. It can function as an arginine methyltransferase that symmetrically dimethylates arginine residues, and it acts as an adaptor protein to mediate the neddylation of p53, which leads to the suppression of p53 function. This gene is known to be down-regulated in melanocytes from patients with vitiligo, a skin disorder that results in depigmentation. Polymorphisms in this gene are associated with chronic otitis media with effusion and recurrent otitis media (COME/ROM), a hearing loss disorder, and the knockout of the homologous mouse gene results in the deaf mouse mutant Jeff (Jf), a single gene model of otitis media. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 2-47799147-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47799147-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 42467.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-47799147-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.424 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0129 (1964/151874) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0428 (1771/41380). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0411. There are 36 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 959 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 36 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | NM_000179.3 | c.1164C>T | p.His388His | synonymous_variant | 4/10 | ENST00000234420.11 | NP_000170.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | ENST00000234420.11 | c.1164C>T | p.His388His | synonymous_variant | 4/10 | 1 | NM_000179.3 | ENSP00000234420.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0129 AC: 1958AN: 151756Hom.: 36 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1958
AN:
151756
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00351 AC: 881AN: 250986Hom.: 21 AF XY: 0.00260 AC XY: 352AN XY: 135622
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
881
AN:
250986
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
352
AN XY:
135622
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00139 AC: 2034AN: 1461880Hom.: 44 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00125 AC XY: 906AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2034
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
906
AN XY:
727236
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0129 AC: 1964AN: 151874Hom.: 36 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0129 AC XY: 959AN XY: 74276
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1964
AN:
151874
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
959
AN XY:
74276
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 11, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 06, 2019 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jul 10, 2008 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Feb 20, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 01, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 30, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Lynch syndrome 5 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | research | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Sep 05, 2013 | MAF >1% & Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability <0.001 - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Endometrial carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The MSH6 p.His388= variant was identified in 4 of 908 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from cases with high risk breast and colon cancer and was not identified in 332 chromosomes from healthy individuals (Kolodner 1999, Perez-Cabornero 2009, Sanchez 2005, Wasielewski 2009). The variant was identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs55708305) “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified benign, reviewed by an expert panel 2013, submitters: benign by InSIGHT, Invitae, Ambry Genetics, EGL Genetic Diagnostics, Prevention Genetics and Mayo Clinic, and likely benign by Illumina and the Laboratory for Molecular Medicine), Clinvitae (4x), UMD-LSDB (8x neutral), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (4x), Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database (3x), Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (4x) and was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 1240 (29 homozygous) of 276736 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.004 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Observations by population include African in 1060 of 24012 chromosomes (freq: 0.04), Other in 18 of 6454 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Latino in 125 of 34402 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), European Non-Finnish in 37 of 126300 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.His388= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at