20-35433484-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000557.5(GDF5):​c.*425T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0731 in 338,590 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,562 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.057 ( 369 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.087 ( 1193 hom. )

Consequence

GDF5
NM_000557.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.243

Publications

10 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GDF5 (HGNC:4220): (growth differentiation factor 5) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. This protein regulates the development of numerous tissue and cell types, including cartilage, joints, brown fat, teeth, and the growth of neuronal axons and dendrites. Mutations in this gene are associated with acromesomelic dysplasia, brachydactyly, chondrodysplasia, multiple synostoses syndrome, proximal symphalangism, and susceptibility to osteoarthritis. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]
GDF5-AS1 (HGNC:33435): (GDF5 antisense RNA 1) Predicted to be located in mitochondrion. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 20-35433484-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-35433484-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 338310.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.2 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GDF5NM_000557.5 linkc.*425T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 2 of 2 ENST00000374369.8 NP_000548.2 P43026F1T0J1
GDF5NM_001319138.2 linkc.*425T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 NP_001306067.1 P43026F1T0J1
GDF5-AS1NR_161326.1 linkn.135+321A>G intron_variant Intron 1 of 1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GDF5ENST00000374369.8 linkc.*425T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 2 of 2 1 NM_000557.5 ENSP00000363489.3 P43026
GDF5ENST00000374372.1 linkc.*425T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 1 ENSP00000363492.1 P43026
GDF5-AS1ENST00000374375.1 linkn.135+321A>G intron_variant Intron 1 of 1 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0565
AC:
8601
AN:
152142
Hom.:
360
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0354
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0296
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0384
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0706
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.173
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.210
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0617
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0478
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0526
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0559
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0867
AC:
16148
AN:
186330
Hom.:
1193
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.100
AC XY:
10136
AN XY:
101282
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0328
AC:
169
AN:
5148
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0311
AC:
295
AN:
9486
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0758
AC:
335
AN:
4422
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.173
AC:
1340
AN:
7734
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.200
AC:
7256
AN:
36228
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0643
AC:
550
AN:
8548
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0625
AC:
40
AN:
640
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0529
AC:
5554
AN:
105032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0670
AC:
609
AN:
9092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
657
1314
1971
2628
3285
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
102
204
306
408
510
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0566
AC:
8619
AN:
152260
Hom.:
369
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0596
AC XY:
4435
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0354
AC:
1472
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0383
AC:
585
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0706
AC:
245
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.173
AC:
895
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.211
AC:
1015
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0617
AC:
655
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0445
AC:
13
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0526
AC:
3577
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0638
AC:
135
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
413
825
1238
1650
2063
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
120
240
360
480
600
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0549
Hom.:
403
Bravo
AF:
0.0500
Asia WGS
AF:
0.241
AC:
838
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

May 12, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19565498) -

Grebe syndrome Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Multiple synostoses syndrome 2 Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Brachydactyly Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Acromesomelic dysplasia 2B Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Acromesomelic dysplasia 2C, Hunter-Thompson type Benign:1
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
5.4
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
0.24
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.12
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56366915; hg19: chr20-34021282; API